MedTrace Logo

CABG Based on CT-FFR Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography

NCT06028165 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 96

Last updated 2024-07-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aims of study are (1) to compare early and 1-year graft patency rates in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) based on conventional coronary angiography(CAG) versus cardiac computed tomography(CT)-derived fractional flow reserve(FFR), and (2) to demonstrate difference in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Coronary artery bypass grafting based on conventional coronary angiography

Revascularized coronary arteries are decided based on conventional coronary angiography (quantitative coronary angiography)

PROCEDURE

Coronary artery bypass grafting based on cardiac computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve.

Revascularized coronary arteries are decided based on cardiac computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Myongji Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Min-Seok Kim, MD, PhD, MSc · Cardiovascular Center, Myongji Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-10-20
Primary Completion
2024-10-01
Completion
2025-10-01

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06028165 on ClinicalTrials.gov