Effect of Different Mobilization Techniques With Common Use of Interferential Therapy in Patients With Knee OA

Summary

This study aimed to determine the effects of different manual mobilization techniques on pain, muscle strength, and functional limitations in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (Knee OA). A double-blinded pretest-posttest experimental study. This research employed a two-arm parallel group randomized comparative design. A total of thirty participants diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned and equally divided into groups 1 and 2, each containing 15 participants. Both Group 1 and Group 2 underwent Maitland and Mulligan mobilization techniques, alongside a common Interferential therapy (IFT) regimen, over the course of three sessions per week for a duration of four weeks. The assessment of pain and functional disability outcomes was conducted through the application of The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at the baseline and four weeks following the intervention. To determine the effects of the intervention within and between the groups, the outcome scores were subjected to analysis using both dependent and independent t-tests.

Conditions

• Knee Osteoarthritis

Interventions

OTHER

Maitland's mobilization technique

Maitland's mobilization technique was performed on the patients with its all components, such as 1. Distraction 2. Anteroposterior glides 3. Posteroanterior glides 4. Medial glides and 5. Lateral glides.

OTHER

Mulligan's mobilization techniques

Mulligan's mobilization technique was performed on the patients with its all components using a therapeutic belt, such as 1. Medial mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee flexion 2. Medial mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee extension 3. Lateral mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee flexion 4. Lateral mobilization with movement (MWM) for Knee extension.

OTHER

Interferential Therapy (IFT)

Interferential Therapy was performed on the patients with the following parameters: career frequency 4000Hz; waveform: rectangular; sweep time: 1 second rise and fall and 5 second stay; Treatment duration: 10 minutes; sweep frequency: 10 to 130 Hz. The current intensity was adjusted until the subject reported feeling a strong tingling sensation without causing muscle contraction. A aquatic gel was applied before straping the electopads over treatment area for smooth electrical conduction.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Burdwan Institute of Medical and Life Sciences (BIMLS)

  collaborator UNKNOWN

• King Saud University

  lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

• AMIR IQBAL, MPT · King Saud University

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

45 Years

Max Age

65 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2017-04-10

Primary Completion

2017-09-14

Completion

2017-10-30

Countries

• Saudi Arabia

Study Locations