Comparison of Simple and Continuous Suture Techniques in Oral Surgery

NCT06020157 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34

Last updated 2024-02-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study aims to compare two different suture techniques regarding wound healing. In this research, which is designed as a prospective study, a comparison of simple and locked continuous suture techniques will be done. For this purpose, Selçuk University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, being treated at the full arch flap opened (for alveoplasty). Half of the arch will be closed by a simple suture. The other half will be closed by continuous suture technique.

It is planned to evaluate wound healing with the Landry Healing Index and Early Wound Healing Score. It is planned to measure the amount of knot looseness in millimeters on the 7th day when the sutures will be removed. On the 7th day, it is planned to evaluate the suture removal pain for the patient and the ease of suture removal for the operator with the VAS scale. Data collected from these assessments will be statistically compared for simple and continuous sutures.

Conditions

  • Wound Heal

Interventions

OTHER

Simple Suture Technique

The half of the full arch flap will be closed by the simple suture technique.

OTHER

Continuous Suture Technique

The half of the full arch flap will be closed by the continuous suture technique.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Selcuk University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Şeyma Koyuncu · Selcuk University, Faculty of Dentistry

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-10-05
Primary Completion
2024-02-27
Completion
2024-02-27

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06020157 on ClinicalTrials.gov