Two Different Tranexamic Acid Regimens in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

NCT05994989 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 90

Last updated 2024-12-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The primary aim of this study is to observe the effects of two different methods of administering tranexamic acid (i.v. bolus and i.v. infusion) routinely used intraoperatively in cardiovascular surgery, on patients' postoperative bleeding amounts. According to the hypothesis established in this study, it is anticipated that administering tranexamic acid as an i.v. bolus dose followed by an 8-hour continuous infusion will result in a more stable blood level compared to the sole i.v. bolus application, thereby being more effective in influencing postoperative bleeding levels.

The study has been designed as a prospective observational research. The outcomes of two different tranexamic acid protocols applied during cardiovascular surgical procedures will be compared. The first group will consist of patients who receive a 10 mg/kg i.v. bolus of tranexamic acid after anesthesia induction, followed by an 8-hour i.v. tranexamic acid infusion at a dose of 2 mg/kg/hour. Group 2 will consist of patients who receive three doses of tranexamic acid, 10 mg/kg i.v. bolus after anesthesia induction, in the pump, and after protamine sulfate administration.

The cases collected over a period of 14 months will be divided into two groups and compared in terms of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding levels, as well as their need for blood products.

Conditions

  • Postoperative Hemorrhage

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-08-14
Primary Completion
2024-10-14
Completion
2024-10-21

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05994989 on ClinicalTrials.gov