Comparative Evaluation of Microsurgery vs Conventional Surgical Technique of Gingival Depigmentation
NCT05930392 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2023-07-05
Summary
Gingiva being the most frequently pigmented tissue of the oral cavity challenges a lot of people with an esthetic concern. Increased production of melanin, a pigment produced by the melanocytes present in the basal and suprabasal cell layers of the epithelium leads to the hyper-pigmented appearance. Over the decades many non-surgical as well as surgical techniques have been developed to manage the melanin induced hyper-pigmentation of gingival tissue with comparable efficacies. Till date, the most common gingival depigmentation procedure with satisfactory results remains the conventional scalpel (#15 blade) method. Nowadays, minimally traumatising the surgical field and gaining maximum outputs with help of microscopy and microsurgical instruments has attained a level of utmost importance in surgical procedures including periodontal therapy. Improved results in terms of increased vascularization of the grafts, relatively better percentages of root coverage a significant increase in width and thickness of keratinized tissue, an improved esthetic outcome and decreased patient morbidity in cases of gingival recession treated via microsurgical approach have been observed and well documented. However, perusal of the literature available suggests that clinical outcomes and esthetic potential of the results of gingival depigmentation using principles of microsurgery is an area of interest that still needs to be explored further. This study is therefore aimed at evaluating and comparing the clinical, esthetic and patient-related outcomes of gingival depigmentation performed using microsurgery vs conventional surgical technique.
Conditions
- Gingival Pigmentation
- Melanosis
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Gingival depigmentation using microsurgery
GINGIVAL DEPIGMENTATION USING MICROSURGICAL BLADE AND MAGNIFICATION LOUPES
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional surgical depigmentation
GINGIVAL DEPIGMENTATION USING CONVENTIONAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
AANCHAL SAHNI, BDS · POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES,ROHTAK
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-09-25
- Completion
- 2023-10-10
Countries
- India
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Impact of Microneedling on Coverage of RT1 Gingival Recession in Thin Phenotype.
NCT06432439 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MINST Versus Conventional Subgingival Instrumentation In RT1 Gingival Recession
NCT06044727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Association of Keratinised Mucosa Around Implants and Teeth With Peri-implant/Periodontal Disease and Soft Tissue Conditioning
NCT03501537 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Ceramic Soft Tissue Trimming Bur Versus Conventional Scalpel Technique in Ginigival Depigmentation Procedure
NCT06031116 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and Diode Laser in the Treatment of Gingival Melanin Pigmentation
NCT05304624 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two Different Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions With Porcine Collagen Matrix
NCT03619096 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Using Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin on Root Surface Closure in Patients with Gingival Recession.
NCT05591326 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Microsurgical vs Macro Surgical Approach for Grade II Gingival Recessions Employing Laterally Repositioned Flap
NCT03654339 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin on Healing and Patient Satisfaction Following Laser Gingival Depigmentation
NCT05283668 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of Volume Stable Collagen Matrix in RT2 Gingival Recession Compared to Connective Tissue Graft
NCT05568732 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single Stage Root Coverage for Gingival Recession With or Without Free Gingival Graft
NCT03370042 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Periosteal Pedicle Flap Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Management of Gingival Recession
NCT06529640 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Free Gingival Graft and Linear Incision for Connective Tissue
NCT06365983 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Suturing Technique on Height of Interdental Papilla and Periodontal Healing
NCT03429764 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions on Root Coverage
NCT06438094 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison Between Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT01175720 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Root Coverage by Connective Graft and Different Root Conditioning Adjunctive Therapies
NCT03462368 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Gingival Flap Procedure Using Conventional Surgical Loupes vs. Videoscope for Visualization
NCT05932017 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Harvest of Free Gingival Grafts With or Without the Application of Hemostatic Sutures
NCT05381623 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pinhole Surgical Technique Compared to Connective Tissue Graft in Treatment of Gingival Recession
NCT04356391 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of I-PRF, T-PRF, and 0.8% Hyaluronic Acid Applications in Wound Healing After Gingivectomy.
NCT06865092 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Root Coverage Stability.
NCT05439382 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Conventional Free Gingival Grafts With Partially De-epithelized Free Gingival Grafts
NCT04970524 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Growth Factors in the Treatment of the Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05319938 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Collagen Plug for Alveolar Socket Sealing With Simultaneous Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT03696862 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA