MedTrace Logo

Ultra-Long Peripheral Catheter Versus Accelerated Seldinger Technique Long Peripheral Catheter in Difficult IV Access Patients

NCT07005310 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2025-06-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to perform a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes associated with the use of an ultra-long peripheral catheter using (catheter-over-the-needle technique) versus an AST-long peripheral catheter in adult patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) in a real-world clinical setting. Specifically, the study will assess potential benefits, including longer mean catheter dwell time and improved catheter usability, as well as potential harms, such as increased incidence of catheter-related thrombosis, infections, phlebitis, infiltration, and unplanned catheter removal.

Conditions

  • Difficult Intravenous Access
  • Adults

Interventions

DEVICE

Powerglide pro™

A long peripheral catheter will be placed under ultrasound guidance. This catheter will be placed by using the Accelerated seldinger technique.

DEVICE

Introcan safety deep access

The catheter will be placed using ultrasound guidance and by using the 'catheter-over-the needle' approach.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Ghent

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-07-01
Primary Completion
2026-04-30
Completion
2026-04-30

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07005310 on ClinicalTrials.gov