Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia
NCT05837013 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 34
Last updated 2024-03-22
Summary
Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the most frequently applied method is laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (TEP). In general, this surgery is performed under general anesthesia (GA) in many centers. However, in cases where general anesthesia is inconvenient, local or other anesthesia methods are preferred.
It has been stated in many studies in the literature that this surgery can be performed with methods other than general anesthesia. In a study of 480 patients, one of which was Sinha et al., it was shown that this surgical procedure was successfully performed under spinal anesthesia (SA).
In a prospective randomized study by Dönmez et al., patients who underwent TEP under general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia were compared. It has been reported that TEP repair can be performed safely under SA and that SA is associated with less postoperative pain, better recovery, and better patient satisfaction than GA.2 In a retrospective study by Yıldırım et al. It has been shown that there is significantly less need for analgesics and better patient satisfaction.
There are also many meta-analyses made on this subject in the literature. Compared with GA in these, SA was associated with a longer operative time, and postoperative pain and nausea and vomiting were less in SA. However, the risk of urinary retention in SA was significantly increased. It was observed that there was no significant difference in surgical complications such as seroma and wound infection.
Despite all these studies, until now, there is no clear consensus on which anesthesia should be used.
The aim of the study is to show the effect of both the surgical method and the anesthesia method on the patient during surgery and in the early postoperative period in inguinal hernia
Conditions
- Pain, Postoperative
- Postoperative Complications
- Inguinal Hernia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Spinal anesthesia (with nerve block)
Spinal Anesthesia and Nerve Block: No premedication will be applied. Spinal anesthesia will be administered to the patients in this group in the sitting position with a 27G Quincke needle (15 mg hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine) to be entered through the L2-L3 or L3-L4 interval. If hypotension develops, it will be corrected with a crystalloid infusion and ephedrine. These patients will be administered intravenous sedation with increasing doses of midazolam to provide adequate sedation. According to Hadzic, II and IH nerve block will be performed by applying 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine 2 cm above and 2 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine.
- PROCEDURE
-
General anesthesia (GA)
General anesthesia: No premedication will be applied. In the waiting room, 10 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate solution will be infused IV in 30 minutes. In Group I, 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol and 1 μg/kg fentanyl IV will be given for induction; 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will then be used to provide the muscle relaxation needed for intubation. After intubation, the tidal volume will be set to 6-8 mL/kg and the respiratory frequency PetCO2 32-36 mmHg in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode. Anesthesia will continue to be provided with sevoflurane (1.5%-2%), oxygen-air mixture (FiO 2 = 0.4) and repeated doses of rocuronium (0.015 mg/kg). At the end of the surgery, neostigmine (2-2.5 mg) and atropine (1 mg) will be given IV to antagonize the residual neuromuscular block.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Van Training and Research Hospital
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Konya City Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-09-20
- Primary Completion
- 2024-01-30
- Completion
- 2024-02-15
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPY AND ULTRASOUND ASSISTED TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK METHODS IN LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL HERNIA REPAIR
NCT04875598 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL HERNIA REPAIR AND LICHTENSTEIN HERNIA REPAIR
NCT03935503 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Whole Mesh and Split Mesh Use in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05420376 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair of Inguinal Hernia
NCT01520857 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Open and Endoscopic Technique in Female Inguinal Hernia Repair. FemaleHernia
NCT05863624 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Telescopic Dissection vs. Balloon Dissection During Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03276871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Using Divided Mesh and Using a Non Divided Mesh on Testicular Blood Flow and Volume in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
NCT03421925 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Inversion and Fixation of the Transversalis Fascia in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05420818 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Fixation Versus Non Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty
NCT06258317 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Mesh Fixation and Non-Fixation in eTEP
NCT06417359 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Open Preperitoneal Mesh Versus Retromuscular Mesh Versus Suture Repair for Abdominal Wall Hernias
NCT03255239 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of a Bilateral TAP Block and Preperitoneal Instillation of Local Anesthetic for a Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Repair
NCT02036983 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MESH MIGRATION IN TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL INGUINAL HERNI REPAIR
NCT05655988 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Local Anesthetic Infiltration VS Trasversalis Fascia Block VS Spinal Anesthesia
NCT03128216 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Recovery After General or Spinal Anesthesia for Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02696122 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Quality of Life Effects of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery in Inguinal Hernia Treatment
NCT06988293 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Long Term Results of Randomized Prospective Comparison of Onlay and Sublay Mesh Repair Techniques for Incisional Hernia
NCT02314091 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ventral Mesh Hernioplasty : Laparoscopic Versus Open Sublay
NCT06149858 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Lichtenstein Technique
NCT05504122 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Preperitoneal Versus Pre-trasversalis Hernia Repair
NCT01350830 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Postoperative Pain After Endoscopic TEP vs. Lichtenstein Hernioplasty in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03566433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Importance of Preserving the Round Ligament in the Repair of Inguinal Hernias in Women
NCT06786702 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Factors Associated With Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing TAPP Hernia Repair for Inguinal Hernia
NCT05522608 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
QIPB in Inguinal Hernia
NCT06862609 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02920307 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA