Comparison of Mesh Fixation and Non-Fixation in eTEP
NCT06417359 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2024-05-24
Summary
Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the one method is laparoscopic extended total extraperitoneal repair (eTEP). The benefits of laparoscope include less postoperative pain and complications, faster recovery, reduced chronic pain, and recurrence rate.
One of the recent debates regarding the laparoscopic technique is mesh fixation. Fixation of the mesh to the cooper ligament can prevent mesh migration and consequently reduce the recurrence rate. However, it has been reported that this fixation may increase postoperative pain. Several studies have reported that recurrence may be due to inadequate mesh fixation technique. In contrast, other prospective randomized studies have found relapse unrelated to mesh fixation.
In the eTEP technique, dissection is performed in a larger area than in TEP. For this reason, it can be thought that the possibility of mesh displacement is higher in the eTEP procedure. The purpose of this study is to confirm this idea with a prospective study. There are studies in the literature on mesh fixation related to the total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) technique. However, there is no study on mesh detection in the eTEP technique. The aim of the study is to compare patients who underwent withmesh fixation and without mesh fixation laparoscopic eTEP repair in terms of clinical data such as mesh displacement and hernia recurrence, chronic pain, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications.
Conditions
- Migration of Implant
- Pain
- Postoperative Complications
- Relapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Mesh Fixation
That mesh will be fixation with three tackers.
- PROCEDURE
-
No Mesh Fixation
That mesh will not be fixation
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Van Training and Research Hospital
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-10-04
- Primary Completion
- 2024-04-04
- Completion
- 2024-10-04
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Two Mesh/Fixation Concepts for Laparoscopic Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT02233569 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing eTEP and Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) for Ventral Hernias
NCT04150796 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Fixating Mesh Versus Mesh Fixation With Tissue Glue in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT06412445 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Surgical Repair of Inguinal Hernia Using Sutured Repair Versus Tacker Use
NCT05574751 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sutured vs Sutureless Mesh Fixation for Onlay Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT06209450 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair With Fibrin Glue Versus Tack Mesh Fixation
NCT06679504 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Is it Necessary to Fix Mesh in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
NCT05152654 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPY AND ULTRASOUND ASSISTED TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK METHODS IN LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL HERNIA REPAIR
NCT04875598 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Whole Mesh and Split Mesh Use in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05420376 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
On-lay Versus Pre-peritoneal Hernioplasty in Incisional Lumbar Hernia
NCT06757998 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Incisional Hernia Repair by Abdominal Wall Component Release With Contemporary Onlay Mesh Fixation
NCT06178965 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Results of Randomized Prospective Comparison of Onlay and Sublay Mesh Repair Techniques for Incisional Hernia
NCT02314091 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Fixation inTEP Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02419950 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Suture Repair vs Mesh Repair for Incisional Hernia
NCT05599750 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Open and Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Repair Under Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia
NCT05837013 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trans-inguinal Pre-peritoneal Hernioplasty Versus Lichtnestein's Technique in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03438786 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transfacial Sutures Versus Stapler for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT00773851 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MESH MIGRATION IN TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL INGUINAL HERNI REPAIR
NCT05655988 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT00138957 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ventral Mesh Hernioplasty : Laparoscopic Versus Open Sublay
NCT06149858 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Compare Ventral Incisional Hernia by Laparoscopic vs Open Repair With Mesh
NCT00240188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sublay Versus Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair in Large Ventral Hernias
NCT06643234 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Lichtenstein Technique
NCT05504122 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Open Mesh Versus Suture Repair in Treatment of Abdominal Wall Hernias
NCT01018524 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Prospective Study Of A Size Tailored Approach To Repair Umbilical And Epigastric Primary Ventral Hernias
NCT01639118 ·Status: TERMINATED