Assessment of Photodynamic Therapy With Annatto and Led for the Treatment of Halitosis in Mouth-Breathing Children

NCT05590897 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 52

Last updated 2024-04-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) employing an annatto-based (20%) dye combined with blue LED for the treatment of halitosis in mouth-breathing children. Methods: Fifty-two children six to twelve years of age with diagnoses of mouth breathing and halitosis (score of ≥ 3 on Breath Alert® portable breath meter) were randomly allocated to two groups (n = 26). Group 1: brushing, dental floss and aPDT applied to middle third of the dorsum of the tongue. Group 2: brushing, dental floss and tongue scraper. Breath meter results before, immediately after treatment as well as seven and 30 days after treatment were compared. The normality of the data will be determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Parametric data will be submitted to analysis of variance and nonparametric data will be compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The results of each treatment in the different periods of the study will be compared using the Wilcoxon test.

Conditions

  • Halitosis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Teeth Brushing

All 52 participants were instructed through a lecture on how to perform toothbrushing with a fluoridated toothpaste (Colgate T®) and dental flossing three times per day after meals for 30 days. The Bass technique was taught, by which the bristles should be positioned at an approximate angle of 45º to the gingival pocket on both the free and proximal faces, with the performance of short, slightly circular vibrating movements.

PROCEDURE

Dental Flossing

All 52 participants were instructed to floss, 3 times a day after meals for 30 days.

PROCEDURE

Tongue Scraping

Tongue scraping was performed by the same operator for all participants. Posteroanterior movements were performed with the scraper on the dorsum of the tongue, followed by the cleaning of the scraper with gauze. The procedure was performed ten times on each participant to standardize mechanical removal.

RADIATION

Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT)

One session of aPDT was performed. The annatto photosensitizer was mixed at a concentration of 20% (Fórmula e Ação®, Brazil) in spray form, applied with a sufficient quantity to coat the middle third of the dorsum of the tongue (five sprays) and left for two minutes for incubation. The excess was removed with an aspirator. \|The surface of the tongue remained moist with the photosensitizer itself without the use of water. Six points were irradiated with a distance of 1 cm between points, considering the spread of the light and effectiveness of aPDT. The device was previously calibrated at a wavelength of 395-480 nm. Light was irradiated to ensure a beam area of 2 cm in diameter per point. Energy was 9.6 J and exposure time was 20 seconds per point.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Nove de Julho

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
6 Years
Max Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-02-01
Primary Completion
2023-10-01
Completion
2023-12-20

Countries

  • Brazil

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05590897 on ClinicalTrials.gov