Cardiac Contractility Modulation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and the Various Forms of Atrial Fibrillation

Summary

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a global pandemic which affects around 26 million people worldwide and develops in 10% of people over 70 years . According to the results of the EPOCHA-CHF study, CHF is detected in 7-10% of cases in the Russian Federation . Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with both preserved (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) heart failure. The prognostic impact of AF on CHF is negative, including the significant increase in mortality and hospitalization.

One of the common causes of decompensation of CHF is AF. The debut of AF in CHF is one of the markers of disease progression.

Rapid development in interventional cardiology due to the invention of cardiac catheter technologies during the last decades provided a new option for non-pharmacological treatment of CHF. Nowadays the use of electrophysiological methods of treatment can significantly improve the prognosis of CHF. Pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization devices, and cardioverter defibrillators are the most commonly implanted devices in patients with CHF.

In 2014, the European Society of Cardiology presented a report of the European Heart Rhythm Association on the use of new devices for CHF, including the Optimizer device for delivery of cardiac contractility modulation therapy (CCM) .

It is worth noting that CCM is a new step in the CHF treatment. This device is of proven benefit to patients with symptomatic heart failure on optimal medical therapy who do not qualify for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Multiple studies of CCM show clinical improvement with this therapy, including metrics such as peak VO2, 6MW, and NYHA functional class. However, the vast majority of patients enrolled in these studies were patients in sinus rhythm.

As the technology progressed and the need for the trial sensing led wanted, further experiences incorporated patients with AF. A new generation of devices (Optimizer Smart®), which does not require the implantation of an atrial electrode made it possible to implant CCM in patients with AF.

The present trial demonstrates the results of a pilot study conducted in National Medical Research Center of Cardiology Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation which compares the efficacy of CCM in patients with AF and ischemic and non-ischemic CHF compared to patients who received only optimal drug therapy CHF

Conditions

• Heart Failure
• Atrial Fibrillation
• Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Interventions

DEVICE

optimizer smart

The CCM implantation procedure was performed in the right precordial region of the chest (the right subclavian area). Two active fixation Ingevity leads (Boston Scientific) were advanced via the right subclavian vein into the right ventricle (RV) and actively fixed to the right ventricular septum for ventricular sensing and delivery of CCM signals.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Ministry of Health, Russian Federation

  collaborator OTHER_GOV

• National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

  lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

• Alfiya Safiullina, phd · National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

Study Design

Allocation

NON_RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

NONE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

18 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2018-08-31

Primary Completion

2019-12-10

Completion

2022-03-30

Countries

• Russia

Study Locations