Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Conventional Approach: Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes.

NCT05504109 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2022-08-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The term minimally invasive mitral valve surgery has been reported (MIMVS) by American Heart Association and referred to a collection of new techniques. All of these new techniques aiming to reduce surgical trauma by minimizing surgical incision, modified perfusion methods and use of new instruments . The right anterior mini-thoracotomy is the most common approach, next to it the lower mini-sternotomy approach, then the parasternal incision or the left posterior thoracotomy approach .

Technically MIMVS is more complex, requires a special learning curve and associated with higher Incidence of neurological events, aortic dissection, groin complications and infection despite all these benefits . MIVS also has controversies among cardiac surgeons, because it makes the exposure worse and requires a more complex surgery, which may lead to a less satisfying effect

Conditions

  • Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURE

mitral valve replacement through full sternotomy approach.

compare between Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement and Conventional Approach

PROCEDURE

mitral valve replacement through right mini thoracotomy approach.

compare between Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement and Conventional Approach

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sohag University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-09-01
Primary Completion
2023-04-01
Completion
2023-04-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05504109 on ClinicalTrials.gov