Myocardial Protection in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery

NCT04231903 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 116

Last updated 2020-01-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Perfusion strategies and aortic clamping techniques for right mini-thoracotomy mitral valve (MV) surgery have evolved over time and remarkable short- and long-term results have been re-ported. However, some concerns have emerged about the adequacy of myocardial protection dur-ing the minimally invasive approach and about the role of aortic clamping strategies in this contest.

Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, in terms of myocardial protection, of the en-do-aortic clamp (EAC) versus the trans-thoracic aortic clamp (TTC) in patients undergoing right mini-thoracotomy MV repair.

A single center, prospective observational study was performed between June 2014 to June 2018 on patients undergoing right mini-thoracotomy MV repair with retrograde arterial perfusion and EAC or TTC. The selection of one setting in respect to the other was patient orientated. Myocardial protection was assessed through creatinine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) and cardiac Troponin T (cTn-T) blood levels immediately after the surgical procedure and at 6, 12, and 24 hours and compared between the two groups.

Conditions

  • Myocardial Protection
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Mitral Valve Prolapse

Interventions

DEVICE

Aortic clamp

In the firs group an endo-aortic clamp is used and in the second group an external clamp is used.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Turin, Italy

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-06-01
Primary Completion
2018-06-30
Completion
2018-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04231903 on ClinicalTrials.gov