MedTrace Logo

Comparing Efficacy Between Restricted Kinematic Alignment vs Mechanical Alignment in Bilateral TKA

NCT06323577 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2024-03-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this RCT is to investigate efficacy between restricted kinematic alignment and mechanical alignment TKA in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients.

The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

* Does rKA have better functional outcomes than MA in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients?
* Does rKA have lower pain score than MA in simultaneous bilateral TKA patients? Participants will undergo simultaneous bilateral TKA and randomized one side will use rKA and the other side will use MA.

Conditions

  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • TKA

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Restricted kinematic alignment

TKA using restricted kinematic alignment under robotic assisted surgery (MAKO).

PROCEDURE

Mechanical alignment

TKA using mechanical alignment under robotic assisted surgery (MAKO).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Thammasat University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-03-14
Primary Completion
2026-05-31
Completion
2026-05-31

Countries

  • Thailand

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06323577 on ClinicalTrials.gov