Navigated Versus Convention Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05325060 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2022-04-20
Summary
The aim of this single blinded randomised control trial study was to assess the accuracy of implantation of components and the clinical outcome and complications with the iNAV electromagnetic navigation system compared with conventional techniques. Secondary outcome measures include Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) and rates of revision surgery up to 10 years post operatively.
Conditions
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Electromagnetically navigated total knee arthroplasty
The navigated group had surgery using the iNav portable EM navigation system (Zimmer GmbH, Winterthur, Switzerland and Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and the definitive implant used was NexGen LPS implant (Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, IN, USA), a fixed-bearing bicruciate-sacrificing total condylar implant using traditional instrumentation with no patellar resurfacing
- DEVICE
-
Conventional total knee arthroplasty
The conventional group received surgery using conventional instrumentation and jigs from the implant manufacturer (Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, IN, USA) and the definitive implant used was NexGen LPS implant (Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, IN, USA), a fixed-bearing bicruciate-sacrificing total condylar implant using traditional instrumentation with no patellar resurfacing
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mark JG Blyth, Mr · NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 120 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2007-06-25
- Primary Completion
- 2010-12-07
- Completion
- 2021-07-02
- FDA Device
- Yes
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Brainlab Knee 3 Computer-assisted Navigation Systems and Conventional Instruments in TKA: a Prospective Cohort Study.
NCT04960345 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Pivotal Medial Polyethylene Versus Ultra-congruent in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06676189 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Patients Receiving a Total Knee Replacement With Robotic Assistance or With Conventional Instrumentation
NCT04976972 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of a New Navigation System in Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05435690 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Computer-Assisted Navigation and Conventional Instrumentation for Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03668756 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pinless-Navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01676038 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Navigation-Assisted TKA Using Mechanical vs. Restricted Kinematic Alignment
NCT05516381 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Navigation Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty on the Levels of Inflammation Markers
NCT03163888 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Computer Assisted Total Knee Replacement
NCT00279838 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
RSA and Clinical Comparison of Anatomical and Mechanical Alignment in Total Knee Replacement
NCT02256904 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Approaches in Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
NCT00839020 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Navio Robotic Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03519269 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty Robot Assisted With MAKO™ Robotic System Compared to the Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty by Mechanical Ancillary
NCT03566875 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Navigated and Conventional Implantation Techniques in Knee Replacement Surgery
NCT00431509 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Robotized Navigation Compared to Conventional Technique in Total Knee Replacement
NCT04525950 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment With Gait Analysis of Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Inverse Kinematic Alignment
NCT04912973 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomised Control Trial Comparing Functional Outcomes for Navigated Kinematically Aligned TKR Versus Navigated Mechanically Aligned TKR
NCT04246138 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Study to Evaluate Robot Assisted Total Knee Replacement Outcomes
NCT03523897 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Inflammatory Response Conventional Total Knee Replacement Versus Mako Total Knee Replacement
NCT04192006 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Trial of Navigated and Conventional TKA
NCT01022099 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effect of Mechanical and Functional Alignment in Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty on Ankle Alignment
NCT06259032 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Robotic-arm Assisted Total Knee Replacement and Traditional Total Knee Replacement
NCT05391152 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mako Cementless TKA vs Mako Cemented TKA
NCT06929871 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Total Knee Replacement - Navigated Versus Non-navigated Study
NCT00733330 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mako Functionally Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Mako Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04092153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA