Inflammatory Response Conventional Total Knee Replacement Versus Mako Total Knee Replacement

Summary

Total knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Mid- to long-term follow-up studies have shown good clinical outcomes following TKA; despite these results, there is a high incidence of patient dissatisfaction; 20% of patients reporting dissatisfaction in otherwise uncomplicated procedures.

One reason for early dissatisfaction may be the trauma of surgery may lead to localised and systemic inflammatory responses that impair postoperative clinical recovery; this in turn influences long-term functional outcomes. Surgical techniques that limit the insult of surgery and help to restore the patient's native knee anatomy and kinematics may help to improve clinical outcomes, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction.

The technical objectives of surgery are to restore limb alignment, preserve the joint line, balance flexion and extension gaps, and maintain the normal Q angle for optimal patella tracking. Compromise to the periarticular soft tissue structures may compromise postoperative clinical and functional recovery, reduce stability, and decrease implant survivorship. In conventional jig-based (CO) TKA, bone cuts are most commonly performed using measured resection or gap balancing. The manual error associated with inadvertent soft tissue release during preparation for implantation or tissue damage from the saw blades is an accepted part of the procedure.

The evolution of surgical technology has led to the development of robotic-arm assisted TKA, which uses three dimensional images of the patient's native knee anatomy to guide bone resection and optimise implant positioning. The second-generation RIO Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopaedic system (Mako surgical) uses preoperative computerised tomography scans to build a computer-aided design (CAD) model of the patient's knee joint. The Mako robotic software processes this information to calculate the volume of bone requiring resection and creates a three-dimensional haptic window for the RIO robotic arm to resect.

In short, the robotic technology in TKA allows execution of the preoperative surgical plan without undue soft tissue release, inadvertent trauma from power tools, and minimal trauma to bone surfaces. Conceptually, this Mako TKA should have reduced soft tissue trauma and inflammatory response as assessed with inflammatory cytokines compared to CO TKA.

The overall aim of this single centre, prospective randomised controlled trial is to determine differences in the inflammatory response between CO TKA and Mako TKA.

A comprehensive range of local and systemic biochemical markers, thermal response, and macroscopic soft tissue injury outcomes between the two groups will be recorded and correlated to clinical and functional outcomes over 2-year postoperative. Patients undergoing CO TKA will form the control group and those undergoing Mako TKA will form the investigation group.

Conditions

• Knee Osteoarthritis
• Arthritis
• Surgery

Interventions

DEVICE

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Surgical implantation of prosthetic knee using robotic-arm assist

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Stryker EU Operations BV

  collaborator UNKNOWN

• University College, London

  lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

• Fares S Haddad · UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Study Design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE

Model

PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age

18 Years

Max Age

80 Years

Sex

ALL

Healthy Volunteers

No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start

2018-11-05

Primary Completion

2021-12-31

Completion

2022-03-01

FDA Device

Yes

Countries

• United Kingdom

Study Locations