Effect of Furosemide on ESWL Outcomes for Renal and Ureteral Calculi
NCT05270421 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 500
Last updated 2022-03-08
Summary
The minimally-invasive extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) procedure is generally considered the best first-line treatment option for most adults and children with nephrolithiasis, especially when the calculi are smaller than 2 cm in size. Despite some promising results, few clinical trials have assessed the impact of furosemide on the outcome of ESWL. This study seeks to determine the effect of furosemide on ESWL outcomes when treating renal and ureteral calculi, hypothesizing that it will result in better outcomes for patients.
The present double-blind, randomized clinical trial includes 500 adults aged 18-60 years referring to the ESWL Clinic of Shahid Faghihi Hospital. Using block randomization, the patients are randomly assigned to one of two groups. All patients are to receive sedation with intravenous midazolam and 1000 ml of normal saline 30 minutes before ESWL. The only difference between the groups is that in the furosemide group, 40 mg of furosemide is added to the normal saline in the drug preparation room before administration. All patients are kept under heart monitoring and pulse oximetry until recovery. Pain will be checked for all participants via a telephone interview 24 hours later. The outcomes and possible side effects of ESWL will be evaluated for all patients after two and twelve weeks.
Conditions
- Urolithiasis
- Nephrolithiasis
- Urinary Calculi
- Ureterolithiasis
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Furosemide 40 mg
Standard ESWL + Furosemide 40 mg
- OTHER
-
Conventional Treatment
Standard ESWL
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Dariush Irani, MD · Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-03-31
- Completion
- 2022-07-30
Countries
- Iran
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of Furosemide on Confirmation of Ureteral Patency During Routine Cystoscopy
NCT02960412 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Extra-Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal and Upper Ureteral Stones in Adults Under Locally Infiltrate d Anaesthetics ; a Clinical Randomized Controlled Study
NCT06462573 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Ultra-Mini Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy For Management Of Renal Calculi. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
NCT04764071 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Energy Ramping Versus Fixed Dose ESWL
NCT07334236 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
(SWL) Versus (ODT) Versus Combined SWL And ODT For Radiolucent Stone
NCT03388060 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High Density Renal Stones
NCT04346134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Stone Clearance in Patients With Upper Ureteric Stones Using Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Compared With Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Combined With Tamsulosin Therapy
NCT05725122 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Different Diameter fURSs With Similar RESDs for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT06987760 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT), Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL), and Combined ESWL and ODT as Non-Invasive Modalities for Treating Small and Medium-Sized Radiolucent Renal Stones
NCT06814834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of the Administration of a Food Supplement in Patients With Lithiasis Treated With Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
NCT05525130 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones
NCT04856722 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stenting After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05738304 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Potassium Sodium Hydrogen Citrate Therapy on Renal Stone Recurrence and/or Residual Fragments After Shockwave Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Calcium Oxalate Urolithiasis
NCT01329042 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effects of the Use of Adjuvant Drugs After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Renal Calculus
NCT01215708 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT03932370 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy, Electroconductive and Electrohydraulic Types
NCT06144372 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Predictors of Successful Oral Dissolution Therapy in Radiolucent Renal Stones; A Prospective Evaluation
NCT02373384 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones
NCT06465784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Safety of Narrow Focus (F1) Versus Wide Focus (F3) of Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) for Renal Calculi
NCT04759599 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones
NCT02037906 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath
NCT07306819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pharmacokinetic, Safety and Efficacy Study of OMS201 in Subjects Undergoing Retrograde Ureteroscopic Removal of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT00857090 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2