Scotchbond Universal Plus Compared to Scotchbond Universal for Posterior Class I & II Restorations With Filtek Universal
NCT05248204 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 51
Last updated 2025-12-17
Summary
This research study is looking at a new bond-promoting substance (a dental adhesive called 3M™ Scotchbond™ Universal Plus Adhesive) used between the tooth and dental restoration (filling). This is a randomized, split-mouth study designed to evaluate whether Scotchbond™ Universal Plus Adhesive (SBU+) is as effective at bonding dental fillings as Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive (SBU) for preparation of posterior Class I and Class II restorations in adult patients. Participants must have at least two (2) back teeth that need a filling either on the chewing surface alone (Class I) and/or on the chewing surface and between your teeth (Class II). One tooth will be restored using SBU+ and the other tooth will be restored using SBU adhesive, both filled using Filtek™ Universal Restorative as the filling material.
Conditions
- Cavities of Teeth
- Dental Decay
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Scotchbond™ Universal Plus Adhesive
Eligible tooth with Class I or Class II carious lesion randomized to the SBU+ treatment group will undergo restoration with Scotchbond™ Universal Plus Adhesive using self-etch mode and Filtek Universal Restorative
- DEVICE
-
Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive
Eligible tooth with Class I or Class II carious lesion randomized to the SBU control group will undergo restoration with Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive using self-etch mode and Filtek Universal Restorative
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Solventum US LLC
lead INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
-
Jorge Perdigao, DMD, MS, PhD · University of Minnesota
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-06-14
- Primary Completion
- 2025-03-06
- Completion
- 2025-03-06
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Retention of a Flowable Resin-based Sealant With Two Types of Adhesives
NCT04945382 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite Versus Conventionally Bonded Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions
NCT04888676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Self-etch Resin Based Sealant With and Without Prior Sandblasting
NCT04929327 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study Evaluating Solventum™ Vitrebond™ Pulp Protect Liner/Base for Direct Capping of Pulpal Exposure
NCT07231237 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Different Application Strategies When Using Futurabond Universal in Class V Cavities
NCT03244124 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Deep Carious Lesions With Selective Caries Removal, Partial or Full Pulpotomy
NCT04807244 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Study Aims to Compare the Effectiveness of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-containing Adhesives vs Conventional Universal Adhesives on the Clinical Performance Composite Restorations Through Promoting Dentin Remineralization After Selective Caries Removal Over a Two-year Follow-up
NCT06990945 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Experimental Dental Adhesive With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment
NCT02071953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Bulk-Fill Composite of Posterior Restorations
NCT03230604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Root Canal Preparation by TF and M-Pro on Post-Operative Pain After Single Visit Endodontic Treatment
NCT03412318 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria.
NCT05180903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Pain After Using Reciprocating Motion With Reciproc Files Versus Adaptive Motion With Twisted File Adaptive
NCT03338322 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Temporary Filling Material Composition on the Success Rate of Endodontic Treatments
NCT03488316 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Local Anesthesia in Patients With Marginal Periodontitis Undergoing Scaling and Root Planning
NCT01878864 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Posterior Restorations: Amalgam vs Resin Composite
NCT02393989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Sensitivity Following Placement with Different Restorative Materials in Vital Posterior Teeth
NCT05882760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Role of Biodentine in Class V Dental Lesions on Oral Health Related Quality of Life
NCT03304184 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Self Etch Giomer Based Fissure Sealant
NCT05336162 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars
NCT06000085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07003360 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations
NCT05499494 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Regeneration Using Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin
NCT06086249 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injection-Molding Vs. Incremental Packing of Resin Composite in Cavitated Posterior Teeth
NCT05020093 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Study to Compare Two Revascularization Protocols to Treat Non-vital Teeth With Incomplete Root Formation
NCT01827098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Performance of Self Adhesive Giomer Containing Flowable Composite in Restoring Class V Cavities
NCT04944485 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA