Implant Stability in Autogenous Mineralized and Demineralized Dentin Grafts
NCT05219305 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 36
Last updated 2024-08-16
Summary
The bone grafting materials currently used in dentistry are autografts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic grafts. Among these different types of bone graft materials, autografts are considered to have the most predictable results due to their properties of osteogenesis, osteoinduction, and osteoconduction. However, bone autografts are rarely used due to the high morbidity associated with harvesting the bone graft from the patient with a second surgical site. Because of the increased risk to the patient with autogenous bone grafts, the current standard of care is an allograft, which is a bone graft harvested from cadaver sources such as Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (FDBA). While allografts can only possess the qualities of osteoinduction and osteoconduction, they also have dramatically less morbidity due to the lack of a second surgical site.
Our null hypothesis states that: Experimental groups (mineralized, and partially demineralized dentin grafts) do not show positive changes in implant stability, survival, failure rate, probing pocket depth, and interproximal crestal bone level changes when compared to FDBA
Our alternative hypothesis states that: Experimental groups (mineralized, and partially demineralized dentin grafts) show similar or better results in terms of implant stability, survival, failure rate, probing pocket depth, and interproximal crestal bone level changes when compared to FDBA.
Conditions
- Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Dental Implant Placement
Placement in an edentulous site that was previously bone grafted in the prior study.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Zimmer Biomet
collaborator INDUSTRY -
University of Oklahoma
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Robin Henderson, DDS, MS · University of Oklahoma
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-08-10
- Completion
- 2024-12-31
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Mix of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral: a Possible Solution for Alveolar Ridge Preservation?
NCT06275789 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Bone Graft Placement at Implant Installation on Buccal Plate Stability
NCT01245920 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Demineralized and Mineralized Dentin Grafts in Ridge Preservation
NCT07242313 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Collagen Material and Allograft
NCT04321109 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Socket Grafting for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT01794806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay Graft
NCT01431131 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation With Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Bone Blocks With Autogenous Tooth Graft
NCT05407363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Demineralized Dentin Matrix Versus Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix on Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Molar Extraction Sites
NCT07239193 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of The Post-Extraction Dimensional Alterations Following Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Partially and Completely Demineralized Dentin Grafts Versus Autogenous Whole-tooth Graft
NCT05766137 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft
NCT02998632 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Zimmer Puros® Allograft vs. Creos™ Allograft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT02444052 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Localized Alveolar Ridge Augmentation With Dental Implant
NCT00991965 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Bone Blocks or Xenogenic Bone Block Grafts Loaded With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein 2
NCT01541345 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Histological Comparison of Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized FDBA Alone Versus a Combined Mineralized-Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
NCT01924390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs Autologous Bone Blocks in the Lateral Augmentation of the Jaws
NCT07104370 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Types of Bone Grafts in Patients Who Need One of Their Front Teeth Removed and Replaced With an Implant
NCT06722482 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation in Molar Sites Comparing Xenograft Versus Mineralized Freeze-dried Bone Allograft
NCT05107141 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Study: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Tenting Screws, Acellular Dermal Matrix and Combination Particulate Grafts
NCT01572298 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Amnion Chorion Membrane vs. Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane in Ridge Preservation Procedures
NCT02602223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Vertical Augmentation With Osteon at Dental Implant Placement
NCT01162629 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Putty Allograft vs. Putty Alloplast Graft
NCT05484492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Effect of Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction in the Posterior Maxilla
NCT02952209 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
NCT02154386 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation: Particulate v/s Block Graft
NCT02487784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
2D/3D Imaging to Analyze the Regeneration Rate of Autologous Bone
NCT06141239 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA