Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
NCT02154386 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 46
Last updated 2015-12-03
Summary
Bone grafting following tooth extraction is commonly performed to preserve bony ridge dimensions adequate to support subsequent implant placement. Alveolar ridge resorption commonly occurs following tooth extraction, and the decrease in bone volume has the potential to make dental implant therapy impossible without surgery to reconstruct the ridge. The aim of ridge preservation grafting is to prevent or minimize this resorptive process, thereby preserving an adequate volume of bone for implant placement. Ridge preservation generally involves placement of a particulate bone graft material in the tooth socket, followed by use of a membrane or similar substance over the socket entrance to contain the bone graft. Various grafting materials have been recommended for these ridge preservation procedures, including demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA). The timing of dental implant placement following ridge preservation procedures is controversial, and few studies have examined the effects of different healing time intervals between ridge preservation and implant placement. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the formation of new bone at a site where tooth extraction has been performed followed by grafting using DFDBA. Two different study groups are included, one having the dental implant placed 8-10 weeks after tooth extraction and ridge grafting, the other having the dental implant placed 18-20 weeks after extraction and grafting.
Conditions
- Bone Augmentation
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Ridge preservation using DFDBA
tooth extraction followed by ridge preservation grafting using DFDBA
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 89 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-05-31
- Completion
- 2015-05-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft Versus Platelet Rich Fibrin for the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects in Humans
NCT02154906 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Two Mineralized Cancellous Bone Allografts
NCT02515058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation With Platelet Rich Fibrin Augmented With Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
NCT03043885 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Post Extraction Changes After Ridge Preservation Using Allogeneic Dentin Matrix Vs Demineralized Freeze Dried Allograft
NCT06318650 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Histological Evaluation of Healing Following Ridge Preservation Using a Combined Cortical/Cancellous Mineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
NCT02275767 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Healing at Molar Extraction Sites With and Without Ridge Preservation
NCT02543398 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Porcine and Bovine Xenograft Materials
NCT02802319 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Preservation Using FDBA and a Collagen Wound Dressing in Molar Sites
NCT03191448 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
To Compare Ridge Preservation Technique Using Leukocyte Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) and Freeze-dried Bone Allograft (FDBA) Layered Technique vs L-PRF/FDBA and L-PRF Alone in Influencing Quantity and Quality of New Bone Formation in Grafted Extraction Sockets
NCT04133363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Autologous Dentin Matrix
NCT06541236 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Wound Healing Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation Using DFDBA Alone in Particulate Fiber Form and in Combination With Xenograft
NCT05400213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction.
NCT05505084 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction
NCT05485194 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Post-Extraction Dehisced Socket - A Case Series Study
NCT02980211 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of The Post-Extraction Dimensional Alterations Following Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Partially and Completely Demineralized Dentin Grafts Versus Autogenous Whole-tooth Graft
NCT05766137 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mineralized and Partial Demineralized Dentin Graft Compared to FDBA
NCT05311735 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Demineralized and Mineralized Dentin Grafts in Ridge Preservation
NCT07242313 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mix of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft and Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral: a Possible Solution for Alveolar Ridge Preservation?
NCT06275789 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
An RCT Comparing Xenograft and Allograft for Ridge Preservation
NCT02330523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Leukocyte-platelet Rich Fibrin for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05572242 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Study: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Tenting Screws, Acellular Dermal Matrix and Combination Particulate Grafts
NCT01572298 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Dental Pulp Tissue as an Autogenous Graft for Ridge Augmentation
NCT03943849 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Volumetric Assessment of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Utilizing Different Bone Grafting Materials
NCT02532543 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Socket Grafting for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT01794806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Stability in Autogenous Mineralized and Demineralized Dentin Grafts
NCT05219305 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA