Clinical Study on the Application of a Specimen Retrieving Bag to Reduce the Polyp Fragmentation Rate
NCT05189912 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 204
Last updated 2024-04-02
Summary
It is necessary to retrieve the resected polyp to determine the pathological nature of polyp and to judge the completeness of resection in polypectomy. For polyps with a larger diameter (\>5mm), the most reliable way to retrieve them is to suck them out with the colonoscope. However, this method requires multiple colonoscope insertions, resulting in prolonged operation time and increased patient suffering. Therefore, clinicians often receive polyps by pressing the colonoscope suction valve. But it is difficult to receive polyps or even fail to receive. Even if the polyps were successfully received by this method, many polyps were fragmented. When the polyp is fragmented, the pathologist cannot be sure of the completeness of the polyp removal.
By removing the colonoscope suction valve and connecting a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port, the polyp fragmentation rate was reduced greatly. To further reduce the polyp fragmentation rate, while reducing the operation time and colon insertions, we applied the polyp receiving bag in colonoscopy operations. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the polyp retrieving bag to reduce the polyp fragmentation rate.
Conditions
- Colonic Polyp
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Specimen retrieving bag
Specimen retrieving bag was used to retrieve resected polyps.
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Sucking polyps to the instrument channel port
Remove the colonoscope suction valve and connect a polyp trap to suction onto the instrument channel port.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Affiliated Hospital to Academy of Military Medical Sciences
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Yan Liu, MD · Beijing 302 Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-01-17
- Primary Completion
- 2022-07-30
- Completion
- 2022-08-14
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Hot Snare Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy With Saline Injection for Colorectal Polyps
NCT02239536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Metal Clips With Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Big Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06097637 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Circumferential Submucosal Incision Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Polyps
NCT01369316 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Web-Mediated Risk Assessment for Endoscopic Screening of Colorectal Polyps
NCT03750617 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Artificial Intelligence in the Detection of Right Sided Colonic Polyp in Different Operator Experience
NCT05990218 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Vs. Cold Forceps Polypectomy Using Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02201147 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
UEMR vs. CEMR for Diminutive Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT03833492 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Colorectal Polyp Resection Adequacy
NCT02217085 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Submucosal Injection EMR vs. Underwater EMR for Colorectal Polyps
NCT01712048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Interpretation of Endoscopic Characteristics of Colorectal Polyps With Blue Light Imaging
NCT03569124 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Does Routine Submucosal Injection Improve Complete Resection of 4-20 mm Neoplastic Colorectal Polyps?
NCT04548947 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Assisted Optical Assessment of Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02522702 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Two Types of Biopsy Forceps for Obtaining Cold Biopsy Polypectomy for Small Sessile Colorectal Polyps Less Than 6 mm in Diameter
NCT00855790 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cold Biopsy Forceps vs Cold Snare for Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Removal
NCT04727918 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Rectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection to Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
NCT02198729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study of Colonoscopic Resection of Large Polyps and Flat Lesions
NCT02332772 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Underwater EMR vs. Conventional EMR for Large Non-pedunculated Colonic Polyp
NCT03567746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Polypectomy Site Study
NCT02205125 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
"Underwater" Technique With Submucosal Solution of Viscose Solution -SIC 8000 (EleviewTM) - For Endoscopic Resection of Cole-rectal Polyps With Signs of Fibrosis.
NCT03756636 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predictors of Unsuccessful Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Complex Colon Polyps
NCT02782793 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Real-Time CAD for Colonic Neoplasia: A RCT
NCT05963724 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cold and Hot Snare Resection for Colorectal Polyps Sized 10-19mm.
NCT04451512 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Safety Study of SIC 8000 in Subjects Undergoing Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Colonic Lesions Equal to or Larger Than 2 cm
NCT02654418 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recurrence After Gastric and Intestinal Polyp Resection
NCT07314554 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING