Comparison Between Pupillometry and the Numerical Rating Scale

NCT05019898 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 320

Last updated 2021-08-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Given the difficulties encountered with subjective pain assessment tools, one of the ideas for reducing the occurrence of insufficient analgesia administration in the emergency department is to find a tool capable of measuring pain without requiring the patient's participation, and which could be integrated into the systematic measurement of the 4 other vitals. An interesting idea is the measurement of pupillary diameter and its reflex variations by a portable pupillometer. Indeed, the diameter of the pupil (DP) reflects the constant interactions between the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems at the level of the iris muscles. Pupillometry measures the change in pupillary diameter and allows the performance of three dynamic tests useful in the assessment of pain.

Conditions

  • Pain, Acute

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

pupillometry

Step 1: The triage will be carried out by the nurse. The nurse will then perform a self-assessment of the patient's pain using a simple verbal scale. The nurse will then record the patient's self-assessment of his pain using the numeric scale for pain. Step 2: Immediately after this first assessment, eligible patients will be approached by the study investigator to be included in the study. Step 3: If the patient gives informed consent, the study investigator will perform * The quantification of their anxiety * An assessment of pain by a NeuroLight videopupillometer (iDmed, Marseille, France) using two dynamic tests, the Pupillary Unrest in Ambient Light (PUAL) and the pupillary light reflex. Step 4: One hour after the triage, a second pain assessment will be performed. Step 5: The same pupillometry measurements will be taken immediately after the nurse has assessed the pain.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-08-04
Primary Completion
2022-08-01
Completion
2022-08-04

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05019898 on ClinicalTrials.gov