Comparison of Postoperative QoR-15 Scores Between Sevoflurane and Remimazolam

NCT05019222 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 72

Last updated 2023-04-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the quality of recovery (QoR)-15 scores according to the use of maintenance anesthetics in the cervical spine surgery. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) have been known to help reducing risks of postoperative nausea/vomiting and malignant hyperthermia. However, it is still not enough to explain which is better between TIVA or inhalation anesthesia. In particular, there is no study to investigate overall postoperative functional recovery via QoR-15 in patients receiving TIVA with remimazolam. The hypothesis of the investigators study is that, in patients with cervical spine surgery, total intravenous anesthesia based on remimazolam can improve the the quality of recovery compared to inhalation anesthesia based on sevoflurane.

Conditions

  • Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Surgery

Interventions

DRUG

Sevoflurane based inhalation anesthesia

Sevoflurane group will be inducted with bolus of propofol 1% and maintained with sevofulrane as inhalation and TCI Minto model of remifentanil for general anesthesia.

DRUG

Remimazolam based total intravenous anesthesia

Remimazolam group will be inducted with remiamazolam at 6 mg/kg/h and maintained with remimazolam at 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/h and TCI Minto model of remifentanil for general anesthesia.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Gangnam Severance Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-09-26
Primary Completion
2022-08-14
Completion
2022-08-14

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05019222 on ClinicalTrials.gov