MedTrace Logo

Clinical Trial Comparing Tissue Adhesive Vs. Absorbable Suture Vs. Non-Absorbable Suture

NCT00292513 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2006-02-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Standard suture is superior to both tissue adhesive (2-octyl cyanoacrylate) and absorbable sutures with respect to cosmetic outcome of, complication rate of and parental satisfaction with the closure of low tension facial, neck and shoulder, wounds in children and adolescents

Conditions

  • Cyst of Face, Neck or Shoulder
  • Pilomatrixoma of Face, Neck or Shoulder

Interventions

DEVICE

standard suture (5-0 prolene), topical skin adhesive (dermabond), absorbable suture (5-0 Chromic gut)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Bari B Cunningham, MD · Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
0 Years
Max Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00292513 on ClinicalTrials.gov