Comparative Study of Anchoring-tip vs. Conventional EMR of Colorectal Polyps
NCT04825457 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200
Last updated 2021-04-01
Summary
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective and has been widely used technique for the treatment of superficial colorectal neoplasms. Although, conventional EMR (CEMR) showed high efficacy for the management of colorectal superficial neoplasms, there is problematic limitation in this technique - incomplete resection. In literature, the anchoring-tip EMR (AEMR), named as "Tip-in EMR" was first introduced in 2016 from Japan. Recently, several retrospective studies have been suggested about the effectiveness of AEMR. However, there has been no prospective randomized controlled study to identify its advantage over CEMR. Therefore, the investigators performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial to estimate the effectiveness of AEMR compared with CEMR for the endoscopic treatment of intermediate-size (10 to 20 mm) colorectal polyps.
Conditions
- Colorectal Polyp
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Anchoring-tip vs. Conventional
Anchoring-tip: the snare tip was projected from the sheath by 1-2 mm length. Consequently, a small mucosal incision was made at proximal side of lesion. Then the snare was deployed progressively and adjusted around the lesion trying to obtain free margins. At the final step of both conventional and Tip-in EMR, the lesion was resected. Conventional: After injection of normal saline solution mix, snaring was tried for polyp resection.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2022-03-31
- Completion
- 2022-03-31
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Vs. Cold Forceps Polypectomy Using Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02201147 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Small Colorectal Polyp Removal Using Cold EMR With Hot EMR
NCT03000868 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (C-EMR) Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (H-EMR) for Large Colorectal Polyps (10-20 mm)
NCT06180798 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Improving Complete Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT01471756 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of EMR-P With Conventional EMR
NCT04191473 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
UEMR for Medium-sized Pedunculated Colon Polyps
NCT04837690 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cold or Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for 10-19mm Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT05545787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) vs Cold EMR With Margin Snare Tip Soft Coagulation (STSC)
NCT05041478 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection Versus Standard Therapy of the Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT03868605 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater EMR vs. Conventional EMR for Large Non-pedunculated Colonic Polyp
NCT03567746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Resection of Small Pedunculated Polyps
NCT06097650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Removal of Neoplastic Large Colorectal Polyps: a Prospective Randomized Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection or Conventional Polypectomy
NCT01950117 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cold EMR Vs Standard EMR for the Treatment of Large Nonpedunculated Homogeneous Colorectal Lesions
NCT04418843 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Hot Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy of Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02484079 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hybrid-APC Margin Ablation to Prevent Post EMR Adenoma Recurrence
NCT04015765 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Underwater Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in the Treatment of Non-pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT05825664 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Closure After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Large Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06807073 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Circumferential Submucosal Incision Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Polyps
NCT01369316 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Traction Assisted Polypectomy of the Intestine
NCT00966420 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy (CSP) of Intermediate Sized Colorectal Polyps 10-15 mm
NCT04464837 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Removing 10-20 mm 0-Ip Colorectal Polyp
NCT07114380 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clip Closure of Mucosal Defects After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.
NCT02765022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Types of Biopsy Forceps for Obtaining Cold Biopsy Polypectomy for Small Sessile Colorectal Polyps Less Than 6 mm in Diameter
NCT00855790 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Examining Techniques on Adenoma Miss Rate in Proximal Colon
NCT03355443 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA