Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy (CSP) of Intermediate Sized Colorectal Polyps 10-15 mm
NCT04464837 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 35
Last updated 2020-07-09
Summary
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has become the third most common malignant tumor and is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths worldwide. Adenomatous polyps of the colon are possible precursor lesions for CRC. Screening for CRC has been shown effective in preventing CRC and related deaths, especially colonoscopy and resection of adenomatous polyps. Currently, for intermediate sized polyps 5 - 20 mm hot snare polypectomy (HSP) with the use of electrocautery is conventionally used, causing relevant adverse events including haemorrhage and postpolypectomy coagulation syndrome, but is safe regarding complete resection of the polyp due to burning effect on residual tissue. On the other hand, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has grown popularity. Absence of electrocautery makes it technically easier and most important reduces adverse events. CSP is recommended as the preferred technique for polyps \<5 mm by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. In literature, there is one multicenter trial from Japan recommending CSP for polyps 4-9 mm (average polyp size 5,4 mm) and only a few case studies for polyps 10-15 mm with inconsistent results, especially regarding the complete resection and pathological evaluation of the specimen.
In this feasibility trial, the investigators try to find out if CSP with a new designed polypectomy snare is efficient and safe in terms of complete resection (R0), pathological evaluation and adverse events.
Conditions
- Colorectal Polyp
- Colorectal Adenoma
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy of intermediate sized polyps (10-15 mm)
If an eligible polyp (10-15mm) is found, cold snare polypectomy is performed with the Olympus SnareMaster® Plus Snare
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Technical University of Munich
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2021-01-01
- Completion
- 2021-06-01
Countries
- Germany
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection Versus Standard Therapy of the Colorectal Neoplasia
NCT03868605 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hot Snare Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy With Saline Injection for Colorectal Polyps
NCT02239536 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
R0 Resection Rate Between CSP, cEMR and hEMR for 1-2 cm Colorectal SSLs
NCT05117879 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Precision of Optical Diagnosis in Polyps Between 5-15 mm and Its Implications on Surveillance. A Prospective, Multicenter Study.
NCT04232176 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cold Snare Versus Double Biopsy Polypectomy Technique for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT01646242 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Cold Biopsy Forceps vs Cold Snare for Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Removal
NCT04727918 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Resection Rate of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Large (10-15 mm) and Small (5-9 mm) Colorectal Polyps
NCT03647176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Cold Forcep and Cold Snare Polypectomy for Polyps Less Than or Equal to 3mm in Size During Colonoscopy
NCT04551001 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Removal of 4-10 mm Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps
NCT06937047 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
NCT02476747 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of a New Polypectomy Snare for Cold-polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02245854 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Assisted Optical Assessment of Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02522702 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Diminutive and Small Colorectal Polyps
NCT02717598 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endocuff Vision Assisted vs. Standard Polyp Resection in the Colorectum
NCT03117114 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy
NCT00763425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Colorectal Polyp Resection Adequacy
NCT02217085 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Performance of a Real-time System in the Estimation of Colorectal Polyp Size
NCT06957015 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study on Complications, EfficAcy and Costs of Large Polypectomy
NCT02694120 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Recurrence After Gastric and Intestinal Polyp Resection
NCT07314554 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Cold and Hot Snare Resection for Colorectal Polyps Sized 10-19mm.
NCT04451512 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Circumferential Submucosal Incision Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Versus Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Polyps
NCT01369316 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety Research of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Hot Snare Polypectomy in the Treatment of 4-9 mm Diameter Colorectal 0-Isp and 0-Ip Polyps: a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study(FAST -REST Study)
NCT06658561 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Reducing Neoplasia Recurrence After Non-thermal Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps
NCT07242820 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cold Snare Polypectomy Vs. Cold Forceps Polypectomy Using Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Removal of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps
NCT02201147 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reducing Neoplasia Recurrence After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps
NCT06271941 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA