Evaluation of Papilla Index Around Immediate Mandibular Molar Implants Using Customized Healing Abutment Versus Submerged Healing
NCT04449302 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 22
Last updated 2020-06-26
Summary
The original implant treatment protocol recommended that the implant should be placed in a fully healed site and covered with mucosa after placement to ensure osseointegration. The reason was to protect the implant site from bacterial contamination and to avoid loading of the implant. After that, a second stage surgical procedure had to be performed to expose the implant to connect the abutment. However, it was shown that a one stage or non-submerged (NS) approach can lead to successful and predictable outcomes.
Customized healing abutments can be used in the non-submerged protocol, protecting and containing the bone substitute during healing, preserving the alveolar contour, preventing food impaction, and eliminating the need for a second stage surgery and. By means of this technique, critical and subcritical contours can be projected speeding up the peri-implant soft tissue conditioning phase in order to achieve final natural-like restorations.
This randomized controlled trial will compare the clinical and radiographic hard and soft tissue changes using chairside customized healing abutment versus submerged healing following immediate implant placement in mandibular molars through measuring the horizontal ridge changes by CBCT , the crestal bone loss by a standardized digital x-ray and the soft tissue changes by the pink esthetic score (PES).
Conditions
- Immediate Dental Implant
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Immediate molar implant with customized healing abutment
Patients will receive an immediate implant with customized healing abutment 1. Atraumatic extraction without flap elevation using periotomes and elevators then sectioning of the roots will be performed to preserve the interseptal bone. 2. The drilling will be performed starting from the pilot drill in the interseptal bone to the twisting drills according to the manufacturer's instructions to the selected implant size. The implant is to be placed immediately then the insertion torque will be measured using a torque wrench. In order to place the customized healing abutment, the insertion torque should be more than 25 ncm. 3. The gap distance will be filled by xenograft, a plastic abutment will be screwed in place then a flowable composie resin will be applied around into small amounts and cured to take the soft tissue contour then finishing and polishing of the customized healing abutment will be done.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Omnia Aboul Dahab, Phd · Cairo University
-
Hani El-Nahas, Phd · Cairo University
-
Omnia K. Tawfik, Phd · Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2023-06-30
- Completion
- 2023-10-31
More Related Trials
-
Crestal Bone Changes Following Equi-crestal Versus Subcrestal Implant Placement
NCT06760442 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bone Volume Changes in Immediate Implant Placement Using Allograft Versus Xenograft in Mandibular Molars
NCT06962878 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Buccal Bone Resorption in Immediate Implants in Thin and Thick Buccal Plates of Bone in Esthetic Zone
NCT04630665 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dimensional Changes Following Immediate Implant Placement in Molar Extraction Sockets With or Without Bone Graft
NCT06207617 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
the Peri-implant Tissue Changes Around Implants in the Esthetic Zone Using Demineralized Dentin Graft vs Xenograft
NCT06164353 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Immediate Implant Placement With Titanium Mesh Versus Collagen Membrane in Type II Socket:
NCT06875830 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
IMMEDIATE IMPLANT With Different Types of Membranes
NCT06657651 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement and Early Implant Placement
NCT04029324 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Socket Shield Technique Versus Allograft Buccal Sheet Technique on Alveolar Bone Resorption After Immediate Implant Placement
NCT06566001 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of PEEK and Co-Cr Framework Reinforcement on Marginal Bone Loss Around Implants Supporting a Fixed All-on-four Prosthesis in Completely Edentulous Mandibles. A Randomized Controlled Clinial Trial
NCT06591611 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Peri-implant Bone Dehiscence Using Autogenous Tooth Plate
NCT06313216 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Two-piece Versus Single-piece Patient-specific Titanium Subperiosteal Implants
NCT03242330 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction , Marginal Adaptation And Biocompatibility of Milled Biohpp Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Single Anterior Crowns Veneered With Two Different Techniques.
NCT04914325 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
BMP Effect on Implant Stability and Marginal Bone Level After Immediate Placement
NCT07240493 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Chewing Efficiency of Conventional Complete Denture in Comparison to Reinforced Poly Amide Denture
NCT03391063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Immediate Implant Stability When Adding Mixture of Hyaluronic Acid and Melatonin
NCT03692026 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Retention of Metal Reinforced Polyamide Denture Base and Heat Cured Acrylic Resin Denture Base in Complete Mandibular Denture
NCT03385746 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation Between One-piece and Two-piece Implants Supporting Mandibular Screw-retained All-On-Four Full-arch Prosthesis on Peri-implant Bone Changes.
NCT06790524 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Compare the Difference in Occlusal Force Distribution and Denture Retention Using 2 Different Denture Base Materials in Implant Retained Overdenture
NCT07250503 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bio-implant Root Analogue Versus Conventional Screw-type Implant for Management of Pier Abutment in Mandibular Distal Extension Cases
NCT07284680 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Dental Implant Stability Placed in Healed Bony Sites Using Oversized Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Protocol
NCT06917638 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Titanium Versus Soft Metal CAD/CAM Frameworks for All-on-4 Implant Supported Prosthesis
NCT06114966 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Customized CAD/CAM Titanium-Milled Abutments Vs. Custom Abutments Over Immediate Implants in Class II Extraction Sockets in the Esthetic Zone: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT06791655 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Patient Satisfaction and OHRQoL In Removable Versus Fixed Implant Prostheses
NCT04694209 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
1% Metformin Gel-coated Implants and Osteointegration and Crestal Marginal Bone Loss
NCT06031168 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA