Comparing the Effectiveness of Phacoemulsification + ECP Laser and Phacoemulsification Alone for Glaucoma Patients
NCT04295122 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160
Last updated 2020-03-04
Summary
Laser endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) has been in use for the treatment of glaucoma for over 20 years and is usually used in conjunction with cataract surgery. In the US it is one of the most commonly performed cataract 'plus' surgeries. The take-up of ECP laser has been much lower in the UK and Europe. This is partly due to the lack of robust clinical evidence from randomised controlled trials to justify its use in routine practice. More recently the advent of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery techniques (MIGS) has increased the options available for cataract 'plus' surgery. Without any randomised controlled trial data for the use of ECP laser in this context the increasingly popular use of MIGS devices, such as iStent (the current market leader) may further marginalise the use of ECP laser for cataract 'plus' surgery in patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) and visually significant cataract.
To further evaluate the use of ECP laser for the treatment of glaucoma in patients with glaucoma and cataract, investigators plan to conduct a randomised controlled trial comparing cataract surgery alone versus cataract surgery plus ECP laser surgery. Investigators will compare the efficacy of these interventions for the treatment of glaucoma based on clinical outcomes and also undertake a cost-benefit analysis, taking into account the cost of surgery, any reduction in clinical time allocation for procedures, the frequency of intra- and post-operative complications, and any reduction in the need for topical glaucoma treatments post-surgery, as well as the frequency with which further glaucoma filtering surgery is needed for patients in each group.
Investigators anticipate that a total number of 160 patients (80 in each arm) will be adequate to detect whether there is any difference in efficacy between cataract surgery + ECP versus cataract surgery alone. Recruitment is expected to take around 9-12 months. Participants will undergo treatment wash-out (28 days minimum) of any eye drops they use for their glaucoma prior to data collection at baseline (before surgery) and prior to data collection at one-year and at two-years post-surgery. Results will be reviewed during an interim analysis at 6 months once 50 patients have reached that time point.
Conditions
- Glaucoma Open-Angle Primary
- Cataract
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Phacoemulsification+ Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) laser
A clear corneal incision should be used for instrumentation. The choice of viscoelastics to maintain the anterior chamber is left to the surgeon's discretion. Phacoemulsification energy used during the cataract surgery will be recorded. If the patient has been randomised to ECP laser, the viscoelastic will be washed-out of the capsular bag. Further cohesive viscoelastic material will be injected through the main wound between the anterior capsule and iris, until the iris is close to or touching the cornea. A curved ECP probe will be inserted through the corneal incision wound/wounds and 360° of the anterior section of the ciliary processes will be treated. The power setting will be varied according to tissue response (starting power of 250 mW with continuous setting). 'Pops' should be avoided (but recorded) but no indentation used during treatment. Final power used and duration of surgery will be recorded.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator OTHER
-
Imperial College London
collaborator OTHER -
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-03-15
- Primary Completion
- 2022-03-14
- Completion
- 2023-03-14
More Related Trials
-
Lens Extraction Combined With Goniosynechialysis Versus Trabeculectomy
NCT04703712 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty (MLT) Versus Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) for Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma
NCT01956942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparation of CLASS Combined With Phacoemulsification and CLASS Alone in the Treatment of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
NCT04920227 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Combined Phacoemulsification and Diode Laser Therapy in Chronic Angle Closure Glaucoma
NCT05576493 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laser-1st vs Drops-1st for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
NCT03395535 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Argon Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty in Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma
NCT04912310 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Phaco vs. Phaco-ELT vs. Phaco-Trabectome 12m
NCT01194310 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Combined Phacotube vs Phacotrabeculectomy:A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT00273221 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Tolerability of Preservative-free 0.0015% Tafluprost in Glaucoma Patients
NCT03104621 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Phaco Surgery With Goniosynechialysis Versus Trabeculectomy in Glaucoma Treatment
NCT06952153 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Safety Study of Conventional Versus Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Treating End-Stage Glaucoma
NCT00349414 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty (532nm) Versus Conventional Laser Trabeculoplasty (532nm)
NCT01788319 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Glaucoma Treatment Using Focused Ultrasound in Open Angle Glaucoma Patients
NCT02789293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Outcome and Effectiveness Between Micropulse Diode Laser Cyclophotocoagulation and Cyclocryoablation in Treatment of Refractory Glaucoma
NCT05437614 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Argon Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty for Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma
NCT00980473 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery on Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma
NCT02964676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Phaco-ECP vs Phaco Alone in Primary Angle Closure
NCT04562402 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Phacoemulsification on Intraocular Pressure in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (PACG) Patients At Phanat Nikhom Hospital, Chonburi Province
NCT06252246 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laser Peripheral Iridotomy Plus Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty for Primary Angle Closure
NCT02613013 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multicenter Investigation of Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stents vs. Laser Trabeculoplasty
NCT02327312 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of Micropulse Trans-Scleral Cyclophotocoagulation Laser (MP-TSCPC) for Glaucoma Patients
NCT05654493 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Efficacy and Safety of Lens Extraction in Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma
NCT03494465 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Phacotrabeculotomy Versus CCI+Phaco in Patients With Borderline Control of Intraocular Pressure
NCT00346931 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Advanced Glaucoma Progression Study
NCT01742819 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Topical Anesthesia and Analgosedation in Micropulse Transscleral Glaucoma Treatment
NCT04448080 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA