Optimising Pacing for Contractility 2
NCT04201015 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 400
Last updated 2024-09-26
Summary
The investigators have demonstrated that they can reliably identify an optimum heart rate range for contractility of the left ventricle in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). They have also demonstrated in an acute cross-over and a small parallel group feasibility study that keeping the heart rate in this range (versus standard rate-response programming) in patients with CHF is associated with increased exercise time on a treadmill (around 60s or 10%). They now want to explore in a randomised, placebo-controlled 3-arm parallel group trial whether optimal programming versus standard rate-response programming versus no rate-response programming for 6 months leads to appreciable improvements in exercise time and quality of life, while having no adverse effects on left ventricular function and battery longevity and what the mechanisms of this might be.
450 patients with CHF and a pacemaker will undergo the non-invasive echocardiographic assessment to establish the force frequency relationship and the optimal heart rate for contractility. They will then perform a treadmill walk test, complete quality of life questionnaires and be offered the opportunity to participate in a series of mechanistic substudies. They will then be randomised to optimal rate-response settings, standard rate response settings or no rate-response settings and followed up at 6 months at which point the tests will be repeated.
Conditions
- Heart Failure, Systolic
- Pacemaker
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Heart rate optimisation using force frequency data
Programming heart rate rise according to the force frequency relationship
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Leeds
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
John Gierula, PhD · University of Leeds
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-12-31
- Completion
- 2025-03-31
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effect of Chronic Changes in Heart Rate on Congestive Heart Failure
NCT00389649 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Techniques for Choosing the Best Place to Put a Pacing Lead for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
NCT02061241 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Dyspnea and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)
NCT00700700 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cardiovascular and Neurohormonal Effects of Faster Atrial Pacing Rate
NCT00698139 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Reprogramming to Prevent Progressive Pacemaker-induced Remodelling
NCT03627585 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Versus Rate-responsive Pacing in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT03338374 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Pacing Rate for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT06445439 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
REmodeling the Left Ventricle With Atrial Modulated Pacing
NCT03210402 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Left Ventricular Pacing Optimilization on Cardiac Perfusion, Contractile Force, and Clinical Performance in Patients With Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure
NCT00551681 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimisation of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy by Non-invasive Cardiac Output - The CHOICE2 Study
NCT01055210 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Care Versus Triventricular Pacing in Heart Failure
NCT02529410 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Mechanistic Insights From Temporary Pacing in HFpEF
NCT06467266 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Heart Failure Study of Multi-site Pacing Effects on Ventriculoarterial Coupling
NCT03189368 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pacing in Heart Failure With Preserved LVEF
NCT03215849 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of His-Ventricular (HV) Interval Optimisation in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
NCT02748876 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cardiac Resynchronisation Study
NCT01213537 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
CCM in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT03240237 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Choosing the Right Pacing Mode in Heart Failure - The CHOICE Trial
NCT00875732 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Testing a New Heart Scan Method to Improve Pacemaker Treatment for Heart Failure
NCT07084467 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Personalized Pacing: A New Paradigm for Patients With Diastolic Dysfunction or Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT04721314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pacing for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT01045291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Physiologic Accelerated Pacing as a Treatment in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT04546555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Diastolic Ventricular Interaction and the Effects of Biventricular Pacing in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
NCT00698074 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure
NCT00180258 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacing Rate
NCT02258061 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1