Optimised Pacing Program
NCT01819662 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1793
Last updated 2018-12-19
Summary
Permanent pacemakers are a common treatment for slow heart beats. In the UK 300,000 people have a pacemaker, and each year another 36,000 receive them. All of these patients are usually seen yearly to have their device checked. However, pacemaker technology is now very reliable, batteries last well over 5 years, and many patients require their pacemaker only occasionally as a back-up. Each visit costs around £200 such that pacemaker follow-up cost the NHS around £50million per year. Most visits involve checking the battery and the leads which, in the absence of symptoms might be unnecessary.
Pacemaker patients are at risk of developing other problems including heart failure which puts them at higher risk of hospitalisation and death. For those under follow-up, no mechanism exists to identify whether they might have heart failure, and for those receiving new implants, it is unclear which will go on to develop heart failure. Also, whether optimal heart failure treatment with a multidisciplinary team reduces the chances that they will be hospitalised is also unproven.
Our study therefore has three main aims: 1) based on pacing indications and patient factors, to identify which patients are likely to develop complications and therefore which patients could be seen less frequently; 2) to validate and refine a simple risk score to help identify which patients in pacing clinic should undergo screening for heart failure; and 3) to establish whether such screening and subsequent optimisation of those with heart failure is clinically and cost-effective for reducing hospitalisation and death.
Conditions
- Pacemaker Complication
- Congestive Heart Failure
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Enhanced standard management
Echocardiogram followed by letter to GP about results.
- OTHER
-
Optimised heart failure management
Echocardiogram followed by referral to comprehensive heart failure service for those with left ventricular dysfunction
- OTHER
-
Standard management
Usual care
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
University of Leeds
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Klaus K Witte, MD · University of Leeds
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2017-10-01
- Completion
- 2019-02-28
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The His Optimised Pacing Evaluated for Heart Failure Trial (HOPE-HF).
NCT02671903 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Care Versus Triventricular Pacing in Heart Failure
NCT02529410 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Personalized Pacing: A New Paradigm for Patients With Diastolic Dysfunction or Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT04721314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcome of Pacemaker paTIents According to Pacing Modality and Primary INDications
NCT00976482 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Developing a New, Dynamic, Therapeutic Pacemaker Algorithm for Stabilising Periodic Breathing in Chronic Heart Failure.
NCT01044407 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Pilot Study: Preventing Adverse Remodelling Following Pacemaker Implantation
NCT03422705 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing and Defibrillation in Heart Failure
NCT00180258 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Mechanistic Insights From Temporary Pacing in HFpEF
NCT06467266 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Physiological Versus Right Ventricular Outcome Trial Evaluated for Bradycardia Treatment Upgrades
NCT06052475 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Right Bifocal Ventricular Cardiac Pacing on Serum Level Natriuretic Peptides in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT02186314 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Left Ventricular Pacing Optimilization on Cardiac Perfusion, Contractile Force, and Clinical Performance in Patients With Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure
NCT00551681 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Investigation of the SelectSecure Pacing Lead
NCT00266682 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the 2-lead OPTIMIZER® Smart System
NCT03339310 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5C
NCT01381172 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Progressive Ventricular Dysfunction Prevention in Pacemaker Patients
NCT00170326 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left Septal or Deep Septal Pacing to Prevent Pacing-induced Cardiomyopathy
NCT06474819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
BRADYCARE: Advanced Bradycardia Device Feature Utilization and Clinical Outcomes
NCT01062126 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
InterventiOn of Biventricular Pacemaker Function on ventrIcular Function Among Patients With LVAD's
NCT03232736 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Leadless Pacemaker Implantation Positions and Its Relationship with Procedure Efficacy and Complication
NCT06692218 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
ConTempoRary Cardiac Stimulation in Clinical practicE: lEft, BivEntriculAr, Right, and conDuction System Pacing
NCT06324682 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Physiologic Accelerated Pacing as a Treatment in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT04546555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
HIS Alternative II - UK Site
NCT05814263 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Registry of Pacemaker Patients Concerning Percentage of Right Ventricular Pacing, LVEF and NYHA Class
NCT00292539 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
PACEVALUE: Development of a Risk Score to Predict Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Patients Undergoing Pacemaker or ICD Implantation and Evaluation of Patient Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness Across Different Healthcare Systems
NCT07276139 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Heart Failure Optimization Study
NCT03016754 ·Status: COMPLETED