To Compare EUS and MRCP in Detecting Choledocholithiasis in Patients of Intermediate Risk of Choledocholithiasis

NCT04173624 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 228

Last updated 2020-08-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A Recent Meta analysis, showed pooled sensitivity and specificity were 97% and 90 for EUS and 87% and 92 for MRCP . This meta analysis includes only 5 studies, smaller sample size in each study, significant heterogeneity in reference standards ranged from ERCP and Intra operative cholangiography (IOC) to clinical follow up for negative patients . Furthur validation of EUS Vs MRCP is needed in detecting common bile duct caliculi in intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis To date Randamized control trail comparing EUS Vs MRCP in detecting Choledocholithiasis lacking , hence the investigators aimed a Randamized control trail determining and comparing the sensitivity and specificity of EUS and MRCP in diagnosing Choledocholithiasis.

Conditions

  • Choledocholithiasis

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Endosonography

Endosonography (EUS) is endoscopic method for evaluated pancreatic and biliary pathology.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography

Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is non-invasive method for evaluating pancreatic and biliary pathology

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-12-03
Primary Completion
2020-07-28
Completion
2020-07-28

Countries

  • India

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04173624 on ClinicalTrials.gov