Prospective Comparison of the Carbon Footprint of EUS vs MRCP for Evaluation of Suspected Choledocholithiasis

NCT07283185 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2026-01-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

MRCP and EUS are diagnostically equivalent in detecting CBD stones among patients with intermediate risk, as shown in a landmark RCT. However, MRI-based imaging is power-intensive, requiring large infrastructure and long scan durations. EUS, a less energy-consuming and portable procedure, has the added advantage of enabling same-session ERCP, reducing the need for repeat procedures.

Conditions

  • Choledocholithiasis

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-12-01
Primary Completion
2026-11-30
Completion
2026-11-30

Countries

  • India

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07283185 on ClinicalTrials.gov