Spyglass DS Peroral Cholangioscope Guided LL or EHL Versus BML for Endoscopic Removal of Complicated Bile Duct Stones
NCT03244163 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 86
Last updated 2024-09-04
Summary
This study aims to compare the overall rate of endoscopic clearance of complicated bile duct stones by Spyglass DS peroral cholangioscopy guided holmium:YAG laser/electrohydraulic lithotripsy versus conventional BML.
Conditions
- Biliary Stones
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Spyglass DS cholangioscope
The 1.8Fr holmium:YAG laser fiber (Lumenis, Yokneam, Israel) will be inserted into the cholangioscope's working channel for lithotripsy under direct visualization. An EHL probe may alternatively be used depending on availability. Lithotripsy is applied until fragments of the targeted stone are no longer lumen filling, and can be dispersed easily with fluid irrigation. Fragmented stones are then removed by a combination of conventional techniques. To confirm stone clearance, the Spyglass DS cholangioscope will be re-introduced, and the bile duct will be examined for residual stones from the confluence of the right and left intrahepatic ducts to the papillary opening
- DEVICE
-
BML
Biliary sphincterotomy with/without EPBD to the size of the lower bile duct with a limit of 15mm will be performed. Stones are removed by a combination of conventional BML, extraction balloon and/or baskets, without laser lithotripsy. An occlusion cholangiogram is performed to confirm stone clearance. In cases where stone clearance is incomplete, a plastic biliary stent bridging the stone will be inserted for temporary drainage until definitive management, usually within one month.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Chinese University of Hong Kong
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
James LAU, MD · Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 99 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-06-14
- Primary Completion
- 2026-06-30
- Completion
- 2026-12-31
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Hong Kong
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Diagnosis and Percutaneous Treatment of Biliary Tract Diseases
NCT06816615 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Mechanical Intracanal (ML) Lithotripsy and Electrohydraulic Intracolangioscopic (EHL) Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Difficult Main Biliary Tract Lithiasis
NCT04970030 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study of 3D Laparoscopy Versus Endoscopy in the Treatment of Choledocholithiasis
NCT04658212 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cholangioscopy With Spyglass DS Using Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography Access
NCT06096129 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Papillary Balloon Dilation Versus Intraductal Lithotripsy
NCT03536247 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Complex Biliary Stones DSC vs ERC
NCT03421340 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Utility of ERCP Guided Cholangiopancreatoscopy With the SpyGlass DS
NCT02524418 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of LCBDE vs ERCP + LC for Choledocholithiasis
NCT02515474 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SpyGlass AMEA Registry
NCT02281019 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Compare Combined Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilation (ESBD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy (ES) in Removing Biliary Stones
NCT00164853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effectiveness and Safety of Single-session Endoscopic Stone Extraction
NCT06349954 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Electrohydraulic Versus Laser Lithotripsy for Treatment of Difficult to Remove Biliary Stones
NCT01571271 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SpyGlass Direct Visualization System Clinical Registry in China
NCT02287194 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
EUS-guided Biliary Drainage Versus Percutanenous Transhepatic Biliary Darinage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction After Failed ERCP
NCT02103413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Chinese Registry Study on Treatment of Cholecysto-Choledocholithiasis
NCT02554097 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
RCT on Robotic vs. Endo-laparoscopic Approach for Difficult Choledocholithiasis
NCT05611840 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Single-session Endoscopic Stone Extraction
NCT06327126 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Optimizing the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Suspected Choledocholithiasis
NCT05141916 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Spyglass-guided Lithotripsy Versus ESWL for Pancreatic Duct Stones
NCT05475782 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital SpyGlass Confirmed Common Bile Duct Stones Clearance Without Fluoroscopy
NCT02967926 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Early Versus Late Laparoscopic Exploration of Common Bile Duct After Failure of Extraction of Common Bile Duct Stones by ERCP
NCT05823181 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Laparoscope Combined Ureteroscopic Air-pressure Ballistic Lithotripsy to Treat Patients With Hepatolithiasis
NCT02127242 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Efficacy of ESWL and Laser Lithotripsy in Chronic Pancreatitis With ERCP
NCT05326542 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single-stage ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: Which to Start With?
NCT06340594 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
To Compare EUS and MRCP in Detecting Choledocholithiasis in Patients of Intermediate Risk of Choledocholithiasis
NCT04173624 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA