Endoscopic Versus Surgical Treatment for T1 Colorectal Cancer

NCT04150081 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 1400

Last updated 2022-03-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The implementation of population screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) has led to a considerable increase in the prevalence T1 CRC originating on polyps amenable by endoscopy. The benefits of secondary oncological surgery in terms of disease free survival are not well established.

Hypothesis: The characteristics of the individuals and the polyp (endoscopic, histological) should allow us to discriminate T1 CRCs that may benefit from secondary surgery from those that only require local treatment. With the current criteria, the management of patients with T1 CRC is suboptimal since a high proportion of patients are refered for unnecessary surgeries without a clear benefit in terms of survival. Molecular signatures can help to discriminate those patients with good prognosis that do not require secondary surgery nor cancer related follow up.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Surgery or Endoscopic treatment

All the patients in the cohort will receive surgery o local (endoscopic) treatment, in some cases additional surgical treatment will be performed after an endoscopic primary treatment. This decision will have been taken based on daily clinical practice and does not represent a study intervention.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Fundacion Clinic per a la Recerca Biomédica

    collaborator OTHER
  • Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-11-01
Primary Completion
2021-05-01
Completion
2022-12-31

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04150081 on ClinicalTrials.gov