Fiber-reinforced Composite Core Filling in the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Molars - a Clinical Study.
NCT04111003 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2019-10-08
Summary
A short fiber reinforced composite base filling material has been shown to improve the strength of a direct composite filling significantly. It prevents fracture propagation and reduces shrinkage strain. These features are needed especially in endodontically treated molars, as root-canal treated teeth are structurally compromised and their restoration is associated with technical failures such as debonding and vertical root fractures.
Application on this core fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) material is simplified when compared to post and core techniques commonly used to restore endodontically treated teeth. Clinically, the use of core FRC offers a cost-effective way to restore endodontically treated molars without root canal involvement.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of endodontically treated molars restored with either direct composite restorations with a FRC substructure, or with indirect full-ceramic onlay restorations, i.e. endo-crowns.
Conditions
- Dental Materials
- Tooth, Nonvital
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
local anesthesia
administering local anesthesia in the region of the planned restorative procedure
- PROCEDURE
-
Tooth restored using SFRC filling
Restoration of an endodontivally treated molar using a shor-fiber base filling and veneering composite
- PROCEDURE
-
Tooth restored using Ceramic indirect endocrown
Restoration of an endodontically treated molar using a ceramic indirect restoration
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
GC Europe
collaborator INDUSTRY -
City of Turku
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
University of Turku
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Pekka K Vallittu, professor · University of Turku
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-12-11
- Primary Completion
- 2017-02-12
- Completion
- 2019-02-06
More Related Trials
-
Direct Versus Indirect Endocrowns on Endodontically Treated Molars
NCT06934460 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restorative Treatment in First Molars Affected by Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization
NCT02717286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Success of Direct Restorations of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth in the Presence of Parafunction: A Pilot Study
NCT06870188 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Two Low-shrinkage Composites
NCT03708510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-efficacy Between ART and Composite Resin Restorations in Primary Molars
NCT02562456 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Fiber Posts or Cast Metal Posts
NCT01461239 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Retrospective Database Study: Influence of Post-endodontic Restoration Placement on Survival of Root Canal-treated Teeth
NCT06441058 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Restoration of Permanent Molars Affected With (MIH) Using Composite Restorations or Preformed Metal Crowns
NCT04658602 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Evaluation of ART Restorations Using Two Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials in Primary Molars
NCT06771362 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT03264105 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Nano Fiber Reinforced Versus Conventional Nano Hybrid Composite in Restoring Premolars
NCT05808075 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Survival of Root Canal Treated Teeth Restored With Ceramic Onlays
NCT03378778 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Longevity of Dental Fillings Utilizing 3D Printing
NCT04630587 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Composite Restorations Performed by Placing Polyethylene Fiber
NCT06346769 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a New Flowable and a New Sculptable Universal Bulk-fill Composite for Direct Restorative Treatment
NCT06369779 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations
NCT05954156 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Restorations and Furcation Involvement on Molars
NCT05481580 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Restoration Quality in Molars Affected by Molar Incisor Hypo Mineralization
NCT04475419 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Psychological Impact of Colored Restorations Cement in Primary Molars
NCT05557682 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of Patients Risk Factors on the Longevity of Aesthetic Restorations
NCT03834636 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Partial Caries Removal in Permanent Molars Restored Using Giomer
NCT06601972 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration Repairs Using Composite Resin Versus Glass Ionomer in Primary Molars: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT04491981 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA