MedTrace Logo

Gingival Inflammatory Response,Bacterial Adhesion and Patient Satisfaction of Ceramo-metallic vs Zirconia Crowns

NCT04077606 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2019-09-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Ceramo metallic restoration has proved high success rate over past years as considered to be the gold standard while Monolithic zirconia as fixed dental prostheses have gained attention because of their good fracture strength, low wear of the enamel antagonist and pleasant color .Material composition will affect gingival health and biofilm formation which initiate caries and periodontal diseases.

Conditions

  • Gingival Inflammation
  • Oral Bacterial Infection

Interventions

OTHER

ceramo-metallic crown prepartion

tooth will be prepared to receive ceramo-metallic crowns

OTHER

full anatomical monolithic zirconia crown

tooth will be prepared to receive monolithic zirconia crowns

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-11-01
Primary Completion
2020-12-01
Completion
2021-12-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04077606 on ClinicalTrials.gov