Vicryl Rapide Versus Nonabsorbable Suture
NCT04056013 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 96
Last updated 2025-02-28
Summary
This will be a prospective, randomized controlled trial assessing noninferiority of Vicryl Rapide compared to nonabsorbable suture. The study will be conducted in the Community Regional Medical Center emergency department (ED). The aim of this study, then, is to prospectively determine if 3-month cosmesis for traumatic laceration repair of trunk/extremity lacerations in adult patients with Vicryl Rapide is noninferior to nonabsorbable suture.
Conditions
- Traumatic Lacerations
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Vicryl Rapide absorbable suture
In general, most laceration repair has been done with sutures on the surface of the skin that do not break down and fall off on their own, so after enough days have passed for the laceration to heal properly, the patient needs to return to the ED to have the sutures removed by cutting them off. These sutures are called "nonabsorbable". Some newer sutures have been designed to slowly dissolve on their own and fall out over several days. These are called "absorbable" sutures. You do not normally need to return to the ED for removal as these should slowly dissolve and fall out on their own.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Central California Faculty Medical Group
collaborator OTHER -
University of California, San Francisco
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Brian Chinnock, MD · University of California, San Francisco
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-09-26
- Primary Completion
- 2028-09-01
- Completion
- 2029-01-31
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Trial Comparing Barbed and Non-barbed Suture for Uterine Incision Closure at Cesarean Section
NCT02962011 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive to Subcuticular Suture Closure of Implantable Port Incisions
NCT02212977 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Wound Closure Using V-Loc™ 90 Sutures in Lipoabdominoplasty Patients
NCT01574378 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Use of Self Retaining Sutures in Open and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
NCT01413607 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Subcuticular Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery
NCT03536832 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Zip® Surgical Skin Closure Device vs. Staples for Skin Closure in Subjects Having Undergone Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02460172 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vicryl Plus and Monocryl Plus in Breast Surgery
NCT00830271 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
5-0 Prolene Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut
NCT03303014 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial Comparing Standard Wound Closure Techniques Versus TissuGlu® Surgical Adhesive
NCT01791504 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Postoperative Pain and Skin Closure Methods After Cesarean Section
NCT02028000 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
6-0 Fast Absorbing Gut Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut for Linear Wound Closure
NCT03303027 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Materials for Subcuticular Suture (Quill vs. Monocryl) on Complications After Liver Resection
NCT04906174 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Closing Uterine Incision During C-section Using Barbed Suture (Stratafix) or Vicryl Suture.
NCT03159871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Suturing Distance From the Wound Edge, 2 mm vs 5 mm
NCT03330041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Antiseptic Sutures and Wound Infection
NCT00932503 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmetic Outcomes of Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures in Pediatric Facial Lacerations
NCT00681070 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Clinical Study Based on Comparison Between Closure of Uterine Incision With Vicryl 2/0 Versus Vicryl 1 in Development of Uterine Niche.
NCT05770115 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Running Subcuticular Suture Versus Running Horizontal Mattress Suture Closure of Linear Wounds on the Trunk and Extremities
NCT05263713 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Barbed Suture and Triclosan-coated Monofilament in Emergency Surgery
NCT03763279 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Antibacterial-coated Sutures at Time of Cesarean
NCT03386240 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Staples Versus Prolene Suture for Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery
NCT01509950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Replacing Buried Sutures With Tissue Adhesive on Aesthetic Outcome of Surgical Wounds.
NCT03425370 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial Comparing Tissue Adhesive Vs. Absorbable Suture Vs. Non-Absorbable Suture
NCT00292513 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Barbed and Conventional Sutures in Adhesion Formation Following Cesarean Section
NCT03183362 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Optimization of the Nursing Time After the Use of Tissue Adhesives During the Chest Port Placement on Patients Treated With Chemotherapy Versus Sutures
NCT04848389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA