Vicryl Rapide Versus Nonabsorbable Suture

NCT04056013 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 96

Last updated 2025-02-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This will be a prospective, randomized controlled trial assessing noninferiority of Vicryl Rapide compared to nonabsorbable suture. The study will be conducted in the Community Regional Medical Center emergency department (ED). The aim of this study, then, is to prospectively determine if 3-month cosmesis for traumatic laceration repair of trunk/extremity lacerations in adult patients with Vicryl Rapide is noninferior to nonabsorbable suture.

Conditions

  • Traumatic Lacerations

Interventions

DEVICE

Vicryl Rapide absorbable suture

In general, most laceration repair has been done with sutures on the surface of the skin that do not break down and fall off on their own, so after enough days have passed for the laceration to heal properly, the patient needs to return to the ED to have the sutures removed by cutting them off. These sutures are called "nonabsorbable". Some newer sutures have been designed to slowly dissolve on their own and fall out over several days. These are called "absorbable" sutures. You do not normally need to return to the ED for removal as these should slowly dissolve and fall out on their own.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Brian Chinnock, MD · University of California, San Francisco

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-09-26
Primary Completion
2028-09-01
Completion
2029-01-31
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04056013 on ClinicalTrials.gov