Dentoskeletal Effects of the Expander With Differential Opening and the Fan-type Expander
NCT03705871 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 48
Last updated 2019-04-18
Summary
This study will assess the dentoskeletal effects of two types of maxillary expanders in orthodontic patients in the mixed dentition, from 7 to 11 years old. Half of participants will be treated using the expander with differential opening, while the other half will undergo rapid maxillary expansion using the fan-type expander. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between dentoskeletal effects of the two protocols.
Conditions
- Malocclusion
- Crossbite (Posterior)
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Differential Expansion
Twenty-four patients will be treated with a rapid maxillary expansion using the expander with differential opening. Appliance anchorage will be performed by bands adapted in the second maxillary deciduous molars and circumferential clamps will be bonded to the maxillary deciduous canines. The activation protocols will totalize an opening of 8mm in the anterior screw of the expander. After the active period of RME, the screws will be fixed with acrylic resin and the appliance will be kept as a retainer for 6 months.
- DEVICE
-
Fan-Fype Expander
Twenty-four patients will be treated with a rapid maxillary expansion using the fan-type expander. Appliance anchorage will be performed by bands adapted in the second maxillary deciduous molars and circumferential clamps will be bonded to the maxillary deciduous canines. The activation protocols will totalize an opening of 8mm screw of the expander. After the active period of RME, the screws will be fixed with acrylic resin and the appliance will be kept as a retainer for 6 months.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
University of Sao Paulo
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 7 Years
- Max Age
- 11 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-11-08
- Primary Completion
- 2018-12-15
- Completion
- 2019-02-01
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effectiveness of Rapid and Slow Maxillary Expansion in Treating Posterior Crossbite
NCT03667508 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairments During Maxillary Expansion
NCT05248087 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Interceptive Maxillary Expansion to Relief Anterior Crowding in the Mixed Dentition
NCT06187337 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Facilitated by Micro-osteoperforation in Adolescent Patients With Skeletal Maxillary Constriction
NCT03772379 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairments During Rapid and Slow Maxillary Expansion
NCT04734054 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Unilateral Posterior Cross Bite in Children
NCT04458506 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Different Rapid Orthodontic Expansion Devices
NCT03258411 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Maxillary Expansion: Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander
NCT05135962 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study the Effect of Upper Expansion Appliances on Lower Jaw Forward Projection/Growth
NCT03286569 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Dentoskeletal Effects of Two Different Fixed Functional Appliances for Correction of Class II Malocclusion: A Comparative Clinical Study
NCT05555719 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Analysis of Palatal Morphology of Growing Patients Treated With Rapid Palatal Expander.
NCT06522607 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Comparative Study Between Modified Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expander And Modified Rapid Palatal Expander in Molar Distalization Using Cone- Beam Computed Tomography
NCT07038902 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Skeletal and Dento-alveolar Effects of Two and Four Mini-screw Supported Hyrax for Maxillary Expansion in Non-growing Patients
NCT06851728 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Removable Devices in Overjet Reduction
NCT06955637 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Two Maxillary Expanders for Maxillary Arch Expansion in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
NCT07056296 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expanders (Conventional, Hybrid and MSE)
NCT05446714 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Friction Versus Frictionless Mechanics During Maxillary En-masse Retraction in Adult Patients
NCT03261024 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Transverse Maxillary Expansion With AMCOP Preformed Appliances
NCT06864949 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Rapid Maxillary Expansion with Low Level Laser Therapy
NCT05586997 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Two Protocol of Maxillary Protraction in Class III Adolescent After Using (MSE)
NCT05489302 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Associations Between Radiographic Inclination of Premolars and Maxillary Expansion
NCT07095374 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Effects of Skeletally Anchored Maxillary Expander Via Two Approaches of Microosteoperforations
NCT05433038 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Dentoskeletal Changes Expansion Using Invisalign Versus Conventional Expander
NCT05899530 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Observational Comparison of Tooth-borne, Bone-borne and Hybrid Distraction Following SARPE.
NCT04670211 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Effect of Different Force Magnitudes on Maxillary Posterior Segment Intrusion
NCT02901678 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA