Control Versus Liberal Cardiac Frequency in Patients in Sepse With Atrial Fibrillation of High Ventricular Response
NCT03715556 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 126
Last updated 2018-10-23
Summary
Amiodarone is considered the medicine of choice in heart rate control in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation with high ventricular response. However, a recent retrospective study showed a greater number of events in critical patients in whom there was an attempt to control versus in which there was no. Therefore, the prospective and randomized comparative use of amiodarone in this group of patients has not yet been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the use of amiodarone (restricted group) versus placebo (liberal group) in heart rate control in atrial fibrillation with high ventricular response in patients with sepsis and vasopressor cardiovascular dysfunction. For this, a unicentric, randomized, blind and prospective study will be performed, in which the restrictive versus liberal strategy is performed in a comparative way. Hospital data (test results, medical evolutions complications) of patients will be analyzed to calculate safety and effectiveness. Expected results: The liberal strategy is superior to the restrictive strategy and causes fewer adverse events.
Conditions
- Sepsis
- Septic Shock
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Ventricular Fibrillation
- Atrial Fibrillation Rapid
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Amiodarone
Administration of the drug will be blinded within the first 48 hours for the principal investigator. Amiodarone (5 mg / kg EV in 30 minutes) will be the drug of choice in the Restricted group blinded to the principal investigator. If there is no reversal / control and there is no adverse event, a further dose of the same previously administered medicinal product will be performed within 30 minutes, amiodarone 3 mg / kg. After the second dose, continuous infusion of amiodarone at a dose of 900 mg in 24 hours will be initiated.
- DRUG
-
0.9% physiological solution
Administration of 0.9% physiological solution.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mucio Tavares, MD · Unidade Clínica de Emergência
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2020-12-01
- Completion
- 2021-12-01
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block
NCT05722379 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Therapy of Cardiogenic Shock
NCT02301819 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recurrent Ventricular Arrythmias in ICU
NCT07033065 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Iv Amiodarone Versus Iv Procainamide to Treat Haemodynamically Well Tolerated Ventricular Tachycardia
NCT00383799 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Study of Triple-site Ventricular Pacing in Patients Who Have Not Responded to Conventional Dual Ventricular Site Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT00941850 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Analysis in the EMERGEncy Between TransVenous Cardiac PACIng Guided by Fluoroscopy Versus Echocardiogram
NCT03037333 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Atrio-ventricular Optimization With His Bundle Pacing on Treatment of Atrio-ventricular Dromotropathy
NCT04544345 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Amiodarone for Shockable Cardiac Arrest
NCT04845607 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Electrical and Hemodynamic Effects of Different Pacing Strategies in CRT Candidates
NCT07032064 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Heart Failure Patients With Ejection Fraction Below Normal
NCT06148571 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
7-day Holter Monitoring in Adult Patients With Recent IS or TIA, to Measure the Prevalence of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Including Episodes Less Than 30 Seconds: Transversal Study
NCT04963647 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Direct HIS/LBB Pacing as an Alternative to Biventricular Pacing in Patients With HFrEF and a Typical LBBB.
NCT04409119 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
To Determine Optimal Time for Delivering Electrical Shocks to Cardiac Arrest Patients
NCT01665755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Risk Factors in Tachycardiomyopathy
NCT03418467 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Amiodarone Usage After Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation
NCT03244748 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Endocardial Pacing in On-table Non-responders in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01193712 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Invasive Programmed Stimulation (NIPS) to Guide the Subsequent VT Therapeutic Strategies
NCT06669299 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prognostic Value of Ventricular Fibrillation Spectral Analysis in Sudden Cardiac Death
NCT03248557 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Conventional Pacing in Atrioventricular Block
NCT05129098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of High Versus Escalating Shocks in Cardioverting Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02923414 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PVC Response ''Atrial Pace'' Inducing Atrial Tachycardias
NCT05344456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sub-threshold Pacing to Prevent Pacemaker-induced Ventricular Tachycardia
NCT01906775 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Right Ventricular Pacing on AHRE Burden in Patients With Preserved LVEF
NCT07250529 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Left vs Left Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05650658 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intracardiac Echocardiography Guided vs. Electroanatomical Mapping System Guided Slow Pathway Ablation in Patients With Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
NCT05907863 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4