MedTrace Logo

Analysis in the EMERGEncy Between TransVenous Cardiac PACIng Guided by Fluoroscopy Versus Echocardiogram

NCT03037333 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2018-10-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A lot of questions about use of temporary transvenous pacing still remain obscure and there is no effective comparison between use of fluoroscopy versus electrocardiogram/echocardiogram in patients with bradicardias. The aim of the study is to evaluate how long does it take to start the correct cardiac stimulation with transvenous pacing in patients with bradicardias comparing use of fluoroscopy versus electrocardiogram/echocardiogram and compare rates of complications between two methods.

Conditions

  • Bradycardia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Transvenous cardiac pacing guided by fluoroscopy

Transvenous cardiac estimulation

PROCEDURE

Transvenous cardiac pacing guided by ECG/ECHO

Transvenous cardiac estimulation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Alexandre Soeiro, MD · Unidade Clínica de Emergência

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-08-16
Primary Completion
2018-12-31
Completion
2019-08-31

Countries

  • Brazil

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03037333 on ClinicalTrials.gov