Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization Versus Plasma Kinetic Vaporization Versus Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate: A RCT

NCT03589196 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 84

Last updated 2018-07-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To Evaluate and compare the outcome and coast of ejaculation sparing management of BPH using 3 different techniques: PVP, PKVP and TURP. Ejaculation sparing TURP group is considered the standard control group. Evaluation will be carried out through a prospective randomized powered trial

Conditions

  • Ejaculation Abnormal
  • BPH With Urinary Obstruction
  • Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Prostate Disease
  • Prostate Obstruction

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization

Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization

PROCEDURE

Ejaculation Preserving Plasma Kinetic Vaporization

Ejaculation Preserving Plasma Kinetic Vaporization

PROCEDURE

Ejaculation Preserving Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate

Ejaculation Preserving Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-03-10
Primary Completion
2019-06-01
Completion
2019-12-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03589196 on ClinicalTrials.gov