Bipolar Plasmakinetic TURP Vs Monopolar TURP in the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

NCT03936244 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2020-11-12

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Randomized controlled trial with one-year follow-up comparing intra, peri and postoperative outcomes for plasmakinetic transurethral resection of prostate (PK-TURP) and monopolar transurethral resection of prostate (M-TURP) in the treatment of LUTS due to BPH in a tertiary-care public institution

Conditions

  • Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
  • Transurethral Resection of Prostate

Interventions

DEVICE

Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)

Randomized allocation to M-TURP or PK-TURP

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Manuel Álvarez Ardura, M.D. · Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada

  • Hugo Otaola Arca, M.D., Ph.D. · Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada

  • Álvaro Páez Borda, M.D., Ph.D. · Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-12-05
Primary Completion
2017-12-12
Completion
2019-12-12
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03936244 on ClinicalTrials.gov