Prospective Comparison of Surgical Outcomes With Using Integrated Robotic Technology Versus Conventional Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer Surgery
NCT03396354 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 140
Last updated 2020-09-29
Summary
Despite the theoretical superiority of robotic technology, surgical outcomes following robotic surgery have shown little benefit over conventional laparoscopic surgery. At present, studies have evaluated the value of robotic technology in clinical practice, including EndoWrist®, TilePro®, Firefly®, and Single-Site®, and have demonstrated the possibility of added clinical value, specifically in regards to decreased postoperative pancreatic fistula, usefulness as a multi-display education system, visualization of lymphatic channels, and implementation of reduced-port robotic gastrectomy. However, these technologies have only been applied independently and not in a well-organized manner.
Maximizing radicality and safety while minimizing invasiveness are critical to bettering cancer surgery. We hypothesize that robot technology can affect these factors positively and that the use of appropriate parameters thereof could help shed more light on the benefits of a robotic system in gastric cancer surgery.
1. Radicality: added benefit of Firefly® for lymph node visualization Number of retrieved lymph nodes can be considered a surrogate marker of long-term survival. In our proposed study, we will focus on the number of retrieved (lymph nodes as the primary outcome. Additionally, bleeding, which is known to be associated with poor overall survival, will be measured as a secondary outcome. Three-year recurrence free survival and 5-year overall survival will be followed up.
2. Safety: benefit of Firefly® in differentiating lymph nodes from other organs and benefit of a magnified view and EndoWrist® Although robotic surgery reportedly shows less in-hospital and outpatient complication rates, a higher number of enrolled patients is needed to statistically validate these results. In the currently proposed study, these would be secondary outcomes. We have experienced the benefit of using fluorescence imaging to differentiate lymph node from biliary trees and pancreas parenchyma. As a reflection thereof, bleeding would be measured as parameter of unintended injury to a normal organ. To evaluate injury to pancreas parenchyma and postoperative pancreatic fistula, amylase/lipase levels in serum and drainage fluid will be measured.
3. Invasiveness: value of Single-Site® Serum CRP (C reactive protein) levels (day 0, day 3, day 5, and 4 weeks after surgery) and pain scores (at 6 hr, 12 hr, 24 hr, 48 hr, and 72 hr after surgery) will be measured to evaluate surgical trauma to the patients. Satisfaction on the wound will be evaluated using Korean version of the body image scale at one month after surgery.
Conditions
- Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Integrated robotic surgery
Robotic gastrectomy using Single-Site and Firefly technology will be performed. Specifically, two-port surgery using the Single-Site port and an independent trocar along the right flank (for harmonic scalpel) will be used, along with peritumoral injection of indocyanine green via endoscopy the day before surgery to completely visualize the entire lymphatic channel.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional laparoscopic surgery
conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy will be performed.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Yonsei University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-01-02
- Primary Completion
- 2023-12-31
- Completion
- 2023-12-25
Countries
- South Korea
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Development of a Versatile Intra-operative On-screen Audiovisual Mentoring System Using TileproTM Program for Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT01319084 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Surgical,Clinical and Oncological Outcomes Between Robotic-assisted and Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy
NCT02413476 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robot Surgery for Right-side Colon Cancer: Short-term Outcome of a Randomised Clinical Trial
NCT01042743 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Liver Resection
NCT06353672 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Safety and Efficacy of Robotic Assisted Surgery Using Vessel Sealer Extend in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT06881043 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Robotic, Laparoscopic and Open Gastrectomy Compared on Short and Long Term Outcomes
NCT02751086 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation
NCT06814093 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Reduced Port Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT04295473 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Analysis of Robot-Assisted Surgery
NCT02292914 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Open Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Gastric Cancer Resection.
NCT03447106 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT01441336 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Intraoperative Adverse Events in Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT05999019 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
National Multicenter Cohort Study of Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopy in Gastric Cancer
NCT06242613 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Robot-assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Population-based Analysis of Prevalence, Trends and Outcomes
NCT06959849 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Clinical Study on Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer (COACT_0301)
NCT00546468 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Short- and Long-term Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy of Right Colon Cancer : A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis
NCT07029464 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Performing Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal and Gastric Cancer Outside the Primary Registered Medical Institution
NCT04834661 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
da Vinci SP Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT05051670 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Short-term Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients With Different Body Mass Index for Mid and Low Rectal Cancer
NCT06396975 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With Versus Without Bursectomy
NCT03117283 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Robotic and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT03500471 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00452751 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopy NOSE for Stage I-III Left-sided Colon Cancer
NCT05970133 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trials on Clinical Outcomes of Totally Laparoscopic Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT03006263 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted and Laparoscopic Right Colectomy Study - Intracorporeal vs. Extracorporeal Anastomoses
NCT03312569 ·Status: COMPLETED