MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Efficiency of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal Infiltration Techniques Using Articaine 4% 1:100000

NCT03130855 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 48

Last updated 2017-05-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This split mouth randomized control trial is designed as to compare the effectiveness of the buccal infiltration technique with the gold standard inferior alveolar nerve block in anesthetizing mandibular second primary molars to undergoing pulpal treatment.

patient will be videotaped during pulpal treatment of their teeth and an accessing pain will be through an objective pain scale (SEM scale), (sound-eye-motor scale).

the patient will be asked to fill in a subjective Wong Baker pain scale for the pain suffered during injecting the local anesthetic agent in both techniques.

Conditions

  • Anesthesia, Local

Interventions

DRUG

inferior alveolar nerve block with 4% articaine

an anesthetic technique using 4% articaine anesthetic solution

DRUG

buccal infiltration with 4% articaine

anesthetic technique using 4% articaine anesthetic solution

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
6 Years
Max Age
8 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-05-15
Primary Completion
2017-07-01
Completion
2017-08-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03130855 on ClinicalTrials.gov