Intraoperative Pain After Infiltration Technique Using Artpharma Versus Artinibsa in Children

NCT04221685 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 130

Last updated 2020-10-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to assess Intraoperative pain for extraction of Maxillary primary molars using Artpharma Versus Artinibsa in children during infiltration technique.

Conditions

  • Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

OTHER

Artpharma

ArtPharma is a unique amide local anesthetic that is currently Used in dentistry Amides has taken over their predecessors esters with their enhanced performance.Each ml Articaine (D.C.I) 40.00 mg hydrochloride, Epinephrine (D.C.I) (tartrate) 0.01 mg

OTHER

Artinibsa

Powerful local anaesthetic with a short latency time. Its high lipid solubility gives it better diffusion through soft tissues and bone and makes it highly effective for infiltrative techniques.Each ml contains: Articaine (D.C.I) 40.00 mg hydrochloride, Epinephrine (D.C.I) (tartrate) 0.01 mg

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
6 Years
Max Age
9 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-12-01
Primary Completion
2021-12-01
Completion
2021-12-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04221685 on ClinicalTrials.gov