Comparison of the Effectiveness of Articaine Local Infusion and Lidocaine Nerve Block in Lower Posterior Tooth Extraction.

NCT07048834 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2025-07-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this study 60 adult patients will participate and divided into two groups (30 for each). The first group will be anesthetized using 2 % lidocaine with 1:80,000 adrenaline by inferior alveolar nerve block technique, while the second group will be anesthetized using 4 % articaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline via buccal and lingual infiltration technique in posterior teeth area. Then patients will wait for five minutes after receiving a local anesthetic injection before extraction could begin.

After that every tooth's buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal surfaces will be examined using a disposable dental explorer. Then by visual analog scale (VAS) which provides accessible, sensitive, valid, and reliable means to measure a variety of subjective parameters the pain score will be registered during tooth extraction.

Female patients who are breastfeeding or pregnant, those allergic to local anesthetics, lacking full mental ability, currently taking opioids, having an infection at the extraction site, or those under the influence of medicines that alter their perception of pain will be excluded from the study.

Conditions

  • Anesthesia

Interventions

OTHER

lidocaine local anesthetic drug

Lidocaine Nerve Block technique

OTHER

articaine local anesthetic drug

Articaine Local Infusion technique

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Amjed Fouad Hussein

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-03-15
Primary Completion
2022-02-20
Completion
2022-05-17

Countries

  • Iraq

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07048834 on ClinicalTrials.gov