Efficacy Study of Articaine Versus Lidocaine as Supplemental Infiltration in Inflamed Molars
NCT01496846 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 201
Last updated 2017-10-31
Summary
The purpose of this trial is to study the ability of a frequently used dental anesthetic (articaine) to achieve complete numbness of a diseased tooth with the most commonly used injection technique in the lower jaw (inferior alveolar nerve block: IANB). If this technique fails, a commonly used supplemental (SUP) technique with one of two possible dental anesthetics (lidocaine or articaine) will be given to evaluate the success/failure of complete numbness between the two anesthetics.
Standardized administration of anesthesia is provided by controlled delivery using Midwest Comfort Control Syringe.
The investigators hypothesize that supplemental infiltration anesthesia with articaine will give the same success rate as lidocaine in achieving complete pulpal anesthesia in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpits.
This study consisted of two periods of patient enrollment, treatment and data collection: Part I: 101 subjects; Part II: 100 subjects.
Conditions
- Irreversible Pulpitis
Interventions
- DRUG
-
IANB Articaine
IANB anesthesia given with 1.7cc of 4% articaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine.
- DRUG
-
SUP Articaine
After unsuccessful IANB with articaine, proceed to give 1.7cc of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in buccal mucosa as a supplemental infiltration injection (SUP).
- DRUG
-
SUP Lidocaine
After unsuccessful IANB with articaine, proceed to give 1.7cc of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in buccal mucosa as a supplemental infiltration injection (SUP).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Dentsply International
collaborator INDUSTRY - lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mathilde C Peters, DMD, PhD · University of Michigan
-
Tatiana Botero, DDS, MS · University of Michigan
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2011-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2016-02-29
- Completion
- 2016-02-29
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Efficiency of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Buccal Infiltration Techniques Using Articaine 4% 1:100000
NCT03130855 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Articaine Local Infusion and Lidocaine Nerve Block in Lower Posterior Tooth Extraction.
NCT07048834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Articaine Infiltration in Anesthetizing Mandibular Second Primary Molars
NCT06201949 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Combined Effect of Oral Premedications on Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Effectiveness
NCT07146997 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effect of Preoperative Oral Ibuprofen on Anesthetic Efficacy of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block With Supplemental Buccal and Lingual Infiltrations Using Articaine in Mandibular Molar Teeth With Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT05927922 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Mental Nerve Block Versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Mandibular Anterior Teeth and Premolars in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
NCT06333730 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hyaluronidase Enzymes and Local Anesthesia
NCT06980363 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Comparing Articaine and Mepivacaine Without Palatal Injection in Pain Assessment During Maxillary Teeth Extraction
NCT03470532 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Articaine Versus Lidocaine Buccal Infiltration
NCT05223075 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Is the Direct Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Required for Third Lower Molar Extraction?
NCT03443726 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Buccal Infiltration and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Extraction of Mandibular Teeth
NCT04294745 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Administration of Different Doses of 4% Articaine.
NCT06644950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Enhancing Anaesthetic Success in Mandibular Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Comparative Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06330519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Homologous Active Principles for Local Dental Anesthesia
NCT04166890 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Articaine 4% Versus Lidocaine 2% for Local Anesthesia of MIH-affected Maxillary Molars
NCT05585112 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
The Effectiveness of Buccal Infiltration Only Using Articaine for Extraction of Mandibular Molar
NCT06161714 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Local Anesthesia With Lidocaine or Articaine for Molars Affected by MIH
NCT05200884 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Comparison of Articaine and Prilocaine for Extraction of Maxillary Teeth
NCT04236115 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Distolingual Infiltration Verses Conventional Nerve Block in Mandibular Third Molar Extraction
NCT07296926 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Infiltration Anesthesia vs. Block Anesthesia
NCT06766981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Intra-ligamentary Injection of Diclofenac Potassium Versus Articaine on Anaesthetic Efficacy in Mandibular Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis.
NCT06500871 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Efficacy of Block Injection of an Anti Inflammatory Medicine in Patients With Mandibular Dental Pain
NCT03410212 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Evaluation of Buffered Local Anesthesia in Dental Extraction.
NCT04773236 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Intraligamentary Injections and Post-endodontic Pain
NCT06186921 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Jaw Muscle Pain Post Wisdom Molar Surgery
NCT07094542 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2