Web-based Tool to Improve the Assessment of Reporting (COBPeer)

NCT03119376 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 120

Last updated 2018-09-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The peer review process is a cornerstone of biomedical research publication. Despite being essential, the assessment of the completeness of the reporting and the identification of switched outcomes are not appropriately performed. Furthermore, these tasks do not suppose a high level of expertise and could be performed by junior researchers.

To assess the completeness of reporting and identified switched outcome(s), junior peer reviewers could use a simple online tool (COBPeer) based on the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) 2010 checklist and Elaboration and Explanation publication for reporting parallel-group RCTs. The tool would feature bullet points eliciting the meaning of each checklist item. The aim of this study that will compare the accuracy of junior peer reviewers using the tool to that of usual peer reviewers when evaluating the completeness of reporting and switched of primary outcome(s) in reports of RCTs

Conditions

  • Peer Review

Interventions

OTHER

COBPEER

At the end of the online training, they can participate in the study and so peer review 1 manuscript randomly selected from our sample with our tool (COBPeer).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Oxford

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of Ottawa

    collaborator OTHER
  • University of California, Los Angeles

    collaborator OTHER
  • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-12-10
Primary Completion
2018-01-20
Completion
2018-01-20

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03119376 on ClinicalTrials.gov