Testing CDS in OSCAR EMR Using STOPP Criteria
NCT02130895 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28
Last updated 2015-12-03
Summary
This mixed methods study seeks to assess and understand the impact of using an advanced CDS tool to present the STOPP criteria to support prescribers at the point of decision-making. We ask the overarching question:
\*\*How can clinical decision support tools effectively translate a complex set of evidence-based rules into primary care clinical practice?\*\*
The work is divided into 2 phases.
PHASE 1: Randomized control trial. We will measure change in potentially inappropriate prescribing by primary care prescribers (e.g. family doctors) who are using the Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool in their Electronic Medical Record (EMR), as compared to those who are not. Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing is defined by the STOPP criteria, the same criteria that will be used in the clinical decision support tool in the EMR. We will use the OSCAR EMR for this study. EMR based queries will be developed to assess the number of potentially inappropriate prescriptions are current in each of 12 physician practices at baseline and at 16 weeks.
PHASE 2: We will then complete a qualitative follow up with participants to aid in understanding how primary care prescribers perceived the CDS. This will help explain Phase 1 findings and provide additional information to enhance future decision support tools.
Conditions
- Prescribing
Interventions
- OTHER
-
STOPP Criteria Decision Support Content
55 previously developed clinical decision support suggestions based on the STOPP criteria will be activated in the physician EMR. Each suggestion provides a patient specific rule that, if triggered will display its title in an existing "Clinical Decision Alerts" box on the bottom right hand column in the patient's EMR chart. For example, in a patient with diabetes and on a beta blocker then the suggestion "Consider: avoiding b-blockers in elderly diabetics with \>=1 hypoglycaemic episodes / month" will be presented to the physician in the side bar (not a popup). The physician then can decide to review, consider, or ignore the recommendation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
University of British Columbia
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-10-31
- Completion
- 2015-10-31
Countries
- Canada
More Related Trials
-
Research Participant Perception of Care Project: Part II: Fielding and Validation of the Research Participant Perception Survey Derived From Focus Group-Identified Key Dimensions of the Research Participant Experience
NCT01129869 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Cluster Randomized Trial to Assess the Impact of Opinion Leader Endorsed Evidence Summaries on Improving Quality of Prescribing for Patients With Chronic Cardiovascular Disease
NCT00175279 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Promoting Organ Donor Registration in Family Physician Offices
NCT03213171 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Advance Care Planning GuideTailored for Primary Care Patients
NCT03906773 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
GP Response to Decontextualised Risk
NCT05399511 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effective Feedback to Improve Primary Care Prescribing Safety
NCT01602705 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Increasing Medical and Nursing Students Searching of Current Best Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions
NCT02240095 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
DÉCISION+, a Continuous Professional Development Program to Improve Optimal Drug Prescription : a Feasibility Study
NCT00354315 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Improving the Outpatient Referral Process With Electronic Communications
NCT00129064 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Research Participants Perceptions of Their Experience in Clinical Studies
NCT00729534 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Patient Perception of Physician's Compassion, Communication Skills, and Professionalism During Clinic Visits: a Randomized Controlled Trial (EHR Study #3)
NCT07089953 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Paid Price Information on Image and Procedure Ordering Rates
NCT02611999 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of the Consent Process
NCT00630136 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness of Electronic Health Record-Based Interventions for Improving Follow-Up in Primary Care
NCT01346839 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Point Of Care Testing In Danish General Practice - Part II
NCT01152177 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the STEP Intervention for Long-Term Care Residents Facing Hospital Transfer Decisions
NCT07153341 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact on Antibiotic Prescriptions of a Bundle Intervention Conducted by Medical Representatives in General Practitioner Facilities, Based on Operational Demonstration of an Internet Decision Support Tool: Antibioclic
NCT04028830 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Achieving Patient-Centered Care and Optimized Health In Care Transitions by Evaluating the Value of Evidence
NCT02354482 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Electronic Medical Record Reminders and Panel Management to Improve Primary Care of Elderly Patients
NCT01313169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Benefits of 'Repeat Back' Protocols Within A Computer-Based Informed Consent Program
NCT00288899 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Comparison of Three Summary of Finding Tables to Improve Understanding in the Presentation of Systematic Review Results
NCT02813941 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Supporting Audit and Feedback to Encourage Vaccine Uptake
NCT05099497 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of a Decision Support Tool
NCT02060981 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Using IVR to Maintain ACS Patients on Best Practice Guidelines
NCT01260207 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Impact of a Patient Decision Aid Intervention
NCT05573022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA