Testing CDS in OSCAR EMR Using STOPP Criteria

NCT02130895 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28

Last updated 2015-12-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This mixed methods study seeks to assess and understand the impact of using an advanced CDS tool to present the STOPP criteria to support prescribers at the point of decision-making. We ask the overarching question:

\*\*How can clinical decision support tools effectively translate a complex set of evidence-based rules into primary care clinical practice?\*\*

The work is divided into 2 phases.

PHASE 1: Randomized control trial. We will measure change in potentially inappropriate prescribing by primary care prescribers (e.g. family doctors) who are using the Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tool in their Electronic Medical Record (EMR), as compared to those who are not. Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing is defined by the STOPP criteria, the same criteria that will be used in the clinical decision support tool in the EMR. We will use the OSCAR EMR for this study. EMR based queries will be developed to assess the number of potentially inappropriate prescriptions are current in each of 12 physician practices at baseline and at 16 weeks.

PHASE 2: We will then complete a qualitative follow up with participants to aid in understanding how primary care prescribers perceived the CDS. This will help explain Phase 1 findings and provide additional information to enhance future decision support tools.

Conditions

  • Prescribing

Interventions

OTHER

STOPP Criteria Decision Support Content

55 previously developed clinical decision support suggestions based on the STOPP criteria will be activated in the physician EMR. Each suggestion provides a patient specific rule that, if triggered will display its title in an existing "Clinical Decision Alerts" box on the bottom right hand column in the patient's EMR chart. For example, in a patient with diabetes and on a beta blocker then the suggestion "Consider: avoiding b-blockers in elderly diabetics with \>=1 hypoglycaemic episodes / month" will be presented to the physician in the side bar (not a popup). The physician then can decide to review, consider, or ignore the recommendation.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • University of British Columbia

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-10-31
Primary Completion
2015-10-31
Completion
2015-10-31

Countries

  • Canada

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02130895 on ClinicalTrials.gov