MedTrace Logo

Effects of Continuous Haemofiltration vs Intermittent Haemodialysis on Microcirculatory Parameters in Septic Shock

NCT02962700 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2016-11-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of the study was to investigate whether CVVH, in comparison to intermittent haemodialysis (IHD), is able to improve regional perfusion in septic shock patients studied by muscle microdialysis

Conditions

  • Septic Shock

Interventions

DEVICE

muscle microdialysis

Systemic haemodynamics and interstitial tissue concentrations of lactate, pyruvate, glucose and glycerol were obtained at baseline, 6, 12,18 and 24 hours after initiation of renal replacement by using muscle microdialysis.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Military Hospital of Tunis

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • mustapha ferhjani · Department of C ritical C are Medicine and Anesthesiology, Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunisia, Tunis, Tunisia

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-01-31
Primary Completion
2018-12-31
Completion
2018-12-31

Countries

  • Tunisia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02962700 on ClinicalTrials.gov