MedTrace Logo

The Comparative Efficacy of the Zio Patch vs Implantable Loop Recorder in Atrial Fibrillation

NCT02954380 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2017-03-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of our study is to investigate if LTCM's are superior to implantable loop recorders in detecting atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation. This study will provide insights on a possible alternative for detection of arrhythmia.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Zio

long term continuous monitoring

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Florida

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • John N Catanzaro, MD · University of Florida

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-11-30
Primary Completion
2017-11-30
Completion
2018-06-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02954380 on ClinicalTrials.gov